Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

LSU in a 4-3 Under

Posted on 12/10/15 at 12:49 pm
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66263 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 12:49 pm
I have been trying to understand this scheme a little better, and i think LSU could recruit and have success in it long term.

I think Gilmore and Lacouture play the 2 Gap 1-4 Tech positions, Godchaux plays the 1 gap 3 tech. Neal is the Leo and Key is the Sam . (going forward you woudl have Alexander in the 4 tech, Lawrence (hopefully) in the 1 tech and Logan in the 3 tech)

the only question is if Key is actually the Sam or if he is a future Leo.

Basically we would just have to keep recruiting big DT and athletic DE and that covers 5/7 seven. Given our history recruiting LBs it think this is a good thing.

IDK

eta: bain isn't on the team and he wouldn't have been a NT anyway. Thanks for correcting that idk why i did that.
This post was edited on 12/10/15 at 1:05 pm
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27418 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

think Bain


Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
27719 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Bain


No longer with team since the beginning of the season. Unless I missed something.
Posted by sportsfan
Member since Feb 2011
3464 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 12:55 pm to
Considering most teams we play run some sort of spread, you can pretty much say our base defense is nickel. I mean, Lamar Louis was our starting SAM, and probably averaged less than 10 snaps a game on defense.

An under front would not work as our base defense. One of those fat boys in the middle would have to come off the field majority of the time.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27418 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Logan in the 3 tech)



I think Logan is gong to be the 5-technique DE

I know Oregron wanted use Godchaux a lot over the centers this year. Not sure if he actually did it or not b
This post was edited on 12/10/15 at 1:01 pm
Posted by AmazinGrace
LSU Fan, Georgetown Alumni
Member since Dec 2013
931 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 1:40 pm to
This is a very versatile defense if you have the talent to run it

Your 1-tech is the bigger DT nose tackle type player
LaCouture, Gilmore, Alexander

Your athletic DT's play a inside 4-tech on the strongside
Godchaux, Herron, Lawrence

Weakside DE's are bigger because they play over the backside tackle
Neal, Logan, Lawerence, Clark, maybe Bower

Stongeside DE's play over the TE and are speed rushers
Key, Bower, Teuhema, Washington

Weakside LB plays close to the line of scrimmage and can rush the Passer
Possibly Key, Bower, Teuhema, Washington, Patterson, Thornton, Anthony

From the naked eye it looks like a 3-4 base defense
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44529 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

(going forward you woudl have Alexander in the 4 tech, Lawrence (hopefully) in the 1 tech and Logan in the 3 tech)


we get back Kwon, Jeremy Lawrence and Bennie Logan? next year = championship

Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
19960 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 1:51 pm to
quote:


LSU in a 4-3 Under
I have been trying to understand this scheme a little better


I don't think you came to the right place.
Posted by Alltheway Tigers!
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7116 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66263 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 3:19 pm to
wow thanks those are some thorough break downs
Posted by Alltheway Tigers!
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7116 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 6:31 pm to


Thanks. The links are a bit dated. That Trojan site has more stuff on Carrol's defense somewhere.

What Carrol is doing at Seattle has numerous articles.

I really like the 4-3 under and I think LSU attracts the type of athletes who make it work. It is a lot like what Pelini when he was at LSU and has concepts of what Saban did here also.

The beauty of the scheme is how is can morph into a 3-4/4-3 when needed.
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44529 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 6:33 pm to
weren't we a 4-3 under when Saban was here? saw a similar link to what you posted back when comparing what we did with what Carroll ran at SC.
Posted by Alltheway Tigers!
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7116 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 7:52 pm to
quote:

weren't we a 4-3 under when Saban was here? saw a similar link to what you posted back when comparing what we did with what Carroll ran at SC.


We ran a 4-3 with Saban. It was a special time because we had TWO bookend DE at 6-4 300lbs that could move (Spears and Hill) a good 3 tech DL (Lavalais) and a solid..maybe under-rate at the time...NT (Kyle Williams).

For example, DE M. Spears dropped into zone coverage during the 2003 Championship game with Okla and comes away with a INT pick 6.

Quick..name the LBs from 2003? If you could do that in 5 seconds either you are like Rainman or really know LSU football. Why? Because that defensive line with very good safeties and CBs covered up the rather average linebacker corp.

Also remember in that same year, Saban converted a safety into a LB (Eric Alexander) due to a lack of LBs. It was a very wise move.

I never was a fan of Chavis' system. The pros include it is easy to implement (as evident by TxAggie defense improvement this year), but it was all based on speed and aggression. Not much discipline. And it was predictable. I think the athletes are available in LA and surrounding area for a more advance defense.

Can Steele pull it off? Dunno how much time he has left at LSU. I think we can see the beginning of it this year. Having Ed Orgeron coaching is a huge plus. He knows the system and knows the type of player it needs, especially on the DL and coverage.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66263 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 8:16 pm to
quote:

Quick..name the LBs from 2003? If you could do that in 5 seconds either you are like Rainman or really know LSU football. Why? Because that defensive line with very good safeties and CBs covered up the rather average linebacker corp.


Thats a very good point

The DLine and the Secondary were the stars under Saban and Pellini

with a few exceptions.

I think that is the way we are moving recruiting DE like Glenn Logan. I think a 4-3 Under allows us to maximize the talent we have on the team and build in Louisiana.

Big DTs and fast DE/OLB types but not as many true LBs

Also we would have a better chance with all those players we lose because "they fit mama's system better"
This post was edited on 12/10/15 at 8:17 pm
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
16155 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 8:20 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 11:27 pm
Posted by ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
44529 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Quick..name the LBs from 2003?


Lionel Turner, Cam Vaughn and Eric Alexander. I think Adrian Mayes was somewhere floating around at OLB too. what do I win?

quote:

I never was a fan of Chavis' system.


I was. just wasn't a fan of his inability to recruit to it consistently.
Posted by Alltheway Tigers!
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
7116 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Lionel Turner, Cam Vaughn and Eric Alexander. I think Adrian Mayes was somewhere floating around at OLB too. what do I win?


Congrats? Mayes was also a converted safety.

quote:

I was. just wasn't a fan of his inability to recruit to it consistently.


I think he recruited well for it, just the system had limitations and his inability to develop talent at the front seven.
Posted by djkevlar
Pineville, La
Member since Aug 2013
554 posts
Posted on 12/10/15 at 9:26 pm to
This is with our current Roster.

Teuhema and Neal would make great ILB while Key and Bower would make great OLB, but you can rotate in Riley, Alexander, and Voohries.

If Beckwith did come back, then he would continue as an ILB with Neal and then Key, Teuhema, and Bower could rotate in as our big LB group. Neal could move to DE in our 4-3 as well as Bower. Then you would have Beckwith at MLB or Neal if Beckwith left, then have Key OLB, Riley OLB and Voorhies/Alexander rotating into the OLB spots.

Now if you include all the new players we are getting, some will hit the ground running and will play immediately, some others may look good on film, but may not get the starting time right away if they don't learn their positions.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
66263 posts
Posted on 12/11/15 at 12:57 am to
quote:

We need to stick with nickel. No Lb talent.


we can't play nickel all the time. Bama and Arkansas aren't leaving the schedule.

Plus you can play against 3 WR sets while still in 4-3 under.

If we move to a 4-3 over 1 LB is essentially a speedy DE. The Seahawks use Cliff Avril as their sam. he played DE in Detroits traditional 4-3.

If we play a traditional 4-3 we have to recruit 3 traditional linebacker positions.

a 4-3 under lets us recruit 2 traditional linebackers and a pass rusher type guy.

We don't seem to have a problem recruiting that type of player (Mingo, Key, Hunter)

it may be a transition process but i think it would be a good fit for LSU. Its a pretty interesting technique.

we need to build our defense to stop Bama. They build their to stop us. You can' go to nickel from any base, but we shouldn't build to a nickel
This post was edited on 12/11/15 at 12:59 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram