Is that a serious post? I just have a lot of trouble believing anyone might be this stupid.
Trent was no doubt, wayyy worse than Brady and JJ already.
Give me anything to support that Brady was a better coach than Johnson. Why is it that Johnson took essentially the same team Brady had from the year before and had almost an immeasurably more amount of success with it?
I want to believe and sincerely hope that Jones is a better coach. I think it's safe to say at this point that he's obviously a better recruiter than both of his predecessors, even after just 1 year. But the fact of the matter is his team has played 6 games, all at home, and only 1 against a competitive opponent. The fact of the matter is, nobody knows how good of a coach Jones will be here yet because there just is not enough evidence.
You would think LSU fans would've learned from the previous staff to temper their expectations before anointing the next John Wooden. And that staff had an entire season under its belt when people were praising it,and a very successful one at that.
The simple fact that players HATED playing for him is enough.
That fact applies to Brady as well. And the players actually QUIT on him. They never quit on Johnson.
I'll also say there was no talk of players HATING to play for him after his first season either.
One example: This "tuba" guy that everyone is so excited about, guess what? HE PLAYED 2 YEARS FOR TRENT! He was a band member who proved how bad Trent and his staff were at LSU, showed absolutely no improvement. Now looks like a potential NBA draft pick. Anyway, as always,
This is really the example you use to support your stance? Well like I said in the beginning of this post, I just have a really hard time believing anyone could be this stupid, do I'll chalk this up to a really shitty toll attempt.