Started By
Message

re: Is this all Alleva or does it go deeper?

Posted on 11/30/15 at 8:41 am to
Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
27719 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 8:41 am to
It is the president of LSU and the morons that are in the public. they all think the school pays the buyout for les, so the president decided that LSU couldn't buyout Miles, even though the money is coming from donations thru TAF, because he would have to go and beg the Gov., a democrat, for money when LSU had to buyout Les contract for $15M.

I am ashamed to say I am born and raised here over this. People need to do their homework. If not for the Athletic Department the school wouldn't be getting $8M per year. Asshats. F King should be fired today.
Posted by OU812
Greensboro, NC
Member since Apr 2004
12560 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 8:47 am to
quote:

California State University, Long Beach and of Murray State University.


Do any of those schools have football programs?
Posted by OU812
Greensboro, NC
Member since Apr 2004
12560 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 8:50 am to
quote:

It's the nature of the state, its people and the atmosphere in Louisiana in general


But the $400 million of state tax payer money that flows into Tom Benson's pockets goes unnoticed.
Posted by Placebeaux
Bobby Fischer Fan Club President
Member since Jun 2008
51852 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Do any of those schools have football programs?



Thank you. Guy just doesn't get it. Needs to go somewhere else.
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34216 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Prove it with sources. I'm assuming you're referring to Scott McKay article in The Hayride.


The tone of his political conjecture certainly sounds like a Hayride reader.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81559 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 9:22 am to
None of it is Alleva.
Posted by GeauxToBed
Covington, LA
Member since Mar 2015
6113 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 9:25 am to
The left-wing extremist school president used Alleva as his scapegoat and fall-guy.

He put his left-wing politics ahead of the best interests of the football program and university.
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11283 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 9:29 am to
It really makes more sense that it was Alexander that screwed this up. He could go down in LSU history as the worst president we've ever had.

Of course he has a contract to 2020.
Posted by tigerborderjumper
Member since Sep 2014
2656 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 9:33 am to
At first, I was full blown anti Alleva and blaming him for the entire sh*t show. During his post game announcement, he didn't seem at all positive or upbeat. That was my take. While I am still not an Alleva fan, I tend to believe he got railroaded himself and hung out to dry. I think maybe he ain't the only one that needs to go.



















i
Posted by RUKidding
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
1070 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 9:37 am to
LSU could be added to his growing list of schools that he screwed up.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27213 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 9:49 am to
quote:

idn't Spurrier really want the LSU job after Bill Arnsparger left in 1986/87 but politics got involved and that's how Mike Archer got promoted to HC?



According to Spurrier that's true. What happened after the 1986 season is that the players and key boosters wanted to maintain continuity on a team that was really stacked talent wise. On offense you had Hodson(Guidry), H. Williams, Wendell Davis as well as an offensive line that was full of All Americans like Albergamo, Andolsek and Norwood and Rodrigue. Defensively the LB's were key with D. Phillips Sancho, Hill, Carrier and Rehage etc.

Archer was supposed to be a project and given the talent level he inherited , it was thought that all he would have to do is coach the defense which he had done a pretty good job of up to that point
Posted by uptownsage
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2014
2156 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 9:53 am to
I don't think LSU needs an AD. They should just fire Alleva and leave the post vacant and let all the big money boosters and contributors leak rumors and hire the coaches they want.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6564 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Look, Alleva doesn't look good, but nothing happens in a vacuum. I suspect there is more to this than just Alleva. He is not the only with a say on matters such as this.

LSU has screwed up on finding and retaining coaches that pre dates Alleva. Mark Emret was the only one who did this right. I think Bob Broadhead ran into shenanigans in his time at LSU. That is not to say that he was pure, but it us in LSU's nature to make a mockery of this process.

IMO this is all very simple and easily explainable.

This is how I THINK it happened. The powers to be got a lot pressure from big money boosters about how the last few seasons have played out and convinced them immediate change was needed.

I think conversations were had with Sexton about Fisher and I think he told them he would listen to any offer LSU was willing to make. IF LSU was able to lock up Fisher then the firing of Miles would have been tolerated by the fan base and the media.

Because of Miles success at LSU he deserved another year to turn things around out of respect, UNLESS they could replace him with a NC caliber coach like Jimbo.

When Jimbo said no thank you.....the powers to be said "if we fire Miles and replace him with a coordinator we will look like fools" so they back peddled on the decision.

I think the silver lining of this is NOW Miles knows he does not have job security and he will either adapt or go down in flames. My heart hopes he adapts but my head tells me he will not change.

Posted by Champagne
Already Conquered USA.
Member since Oct 2007
48217 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 10:39 am to
quote:

This is how I THINK it happened


Seems reasonable to me.

Either Jimbo or Sexton said "no" to an informal offer. Who knows why? Maybe the offer was too low. What WAS the "offer" (because we know it wasn't a formal Offer)? We have no way of knowing for certain.

Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31872 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 10:41 am to
This was a few rungs higher. His downfall IMHO was the silence......
Posted by euquol
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2012
2736 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

Lsu pays a portion of the coaches salary plus they are representing the university so LSU still has a say in hiring/firing of coaches


I did not say LSU had no say. I said he had bullshite reasons for killing the deal. LSU would have paid exactly $0 to fire one staff and hire the next. Private donors would have covered most, if not all, of the money.
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26205 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 6:36 pm to
LSU football just took a backseat to academic financial politics, and that is fricking unacceptable and inappropriate given the financial independence of academics and athletics.

F King has to be removed. I will not rest until he is gone. I'm fuming mad at Alexander, as all LSU football fans should be. He just botched a key decision regarding the state's flagship football program, and he deserves to pay the price. Does he have the authority to make that decision? Of course, and with that responsibility he also gets to face the consequences of his actions.
This post was edited on 11/30/15 at 6:40 pm
Posted by 13
Member since Apr 2006
1383 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

quote: This is how I THINK it happened Seems reasonable to me. Either Jimbo or Sexton said "no" to an informal offer. Who knows why? Maybe the offer was too low. What WAS the "offer" (because we know it wasn't a formal Offer)? We have no way of knowing for certain.


It is reasonable, but not how it went down. Sadly, most LSU football fans know the athletic Dept is funded separately from the University itself. What happened here is that our political figures refused to fight for education and athletic success, they made the president choose one. The president made a decision that is likely in the best interest of the university, but it was politics, no doubt.
Sadly, this is the kind of BS you get when elected officials are more worried about there approval ratings than the issues at hand. The issues the two departments have are separate but your elected leaders are afraid to stand up and portray it that way. They know it will look bad to 'critics' and don't want to fight that battle.
The athletic department can still rebound, the university likely (I use likely loosely) wouldn't have been able to rebound .... Or maybe it was portrayed that way. Strong arm, strong arm, strong arm.

Congrats on the newly elected officials.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27213 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 6:53 pm to
Yes and no. In the end he BOS has to approve all hires and for that matter key firings. It used to be back in the day people used to think Jack Andonie was the power and to a lesser extent it did, but if he did not have the backing of Dr. Charles Cusimano it usually did not fly. That's how we got Gerry DiNardo over Pat Sullivan back in the mid 1990's.

For those that remember after Hallman was booted, there was a search and terms had been reached with Sullivan who was ten coach at TCU that had been negotiated by Joe Dean and Sullivan was slated to be announced as the new coach until Cusimano said no way and got a majority of the board to side with him. As it turned out DiNardo became coach....turned out in hindsight not be the worst decision. Sullivan was fired two years later from TCU and the best he could get was UAB after that and flamed out there. DiNardo was a pretty good coach except for his ego as it applied with his friend Tepper and it destroyed him at LSU.

LSU has a history of screwing up coaching hires, but in this case, personally, I think that paying for Fisher would have been a mistake. I think initially, Fisher would only be marginally better, at best . After the same amount of time you probably would get the same results as Miles and I think that maybe if Saban would have stayed you might have only gotten maybe 1 more NC out of him.

Alabama is a different animal when it comes to football coaches and football. They will break the bank for football because that's all they really care about and even they get it wrong periodically...see Ray Perkins, Mike Dubose, Mike Price, Mike Shula, Dennis Franchione. Hell, Stallings only won one NC and he was hired after a they fired a successful coach in Bill Curry and he won it with Curry's recruits.
This post was edited on 11/30/15 at 6:55 pm
Posted by TigerJeff
the Emerald Coast
Member since Oct 2006
16356 posts
Posted on 11/30/15 at 7:08 pm to
Just my opinion - but Alleva bears some amount of fault for this debacle. Alexander does as well.

Alleva thought he had more authority to make a deal, than he did. Would've been nice if he'd gotten some input from Alexander a little earlier (like two weeks earlier.)

One would think Alexander reads the news and knew what was going on and/or at least being reported. If he had a problem w/ the huge buyout, shouldn't he have told Alleva that it was too much, rather than letting it play out in the media?

At the same time, Alexander has other duties at LSU besides the football team, obviously, and Alleva should have had enough sense to realize the buyout could be a political issue, and had enough sense to speak to Alexander and coordinate everything with him.

What we have here is a failure to communicate. These two guys are highly-paid, and more is expected from them, than this horrible spectacle we saw played out. One, Miles didn't deserve to be hung out to dry publicly, then told sort of in the tunnel after the game, "Oh, yeah, by the way, we want you to be our coach."

If they wanted to pursue Fisher, fine, great, no problem ... but Alleva and Alexander needed to be on the same page.

The big problem is going through this fiasco, and emasculating Miles, harming his credibility w/ recruits ("Just how long do you expect to be coach at LSU, Coach Miles, when your administration was willing to pay you $15 mil to go away?"), and THEN, keeping him!

I honestly thought they had gone past the point of no return w/ Miles... no way they could keep him after giving him a zero vote of confidence ... but they surprised me. Horrible, horrible, horrible administration, leadership, athletic directorship, public relations .... you name it.

HORRIBLE
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram