Started By
Message
locked post

False start on final play vs. UW

Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:34 am
Posted by tigerbait1970
H-Town
Member since Oct 2007
574 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:34 am
I'm sure this has been talked about but I just watched the game again on DVR and on the last play the right tackle definitely moves back before the snap. Just an observation.

Posted by Gamer
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2009
2013 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:34 am to
ok
Posted by Snarf Snarf
Thundera
Member since Jul 2009
524 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:35 am to
they had to cheat to make it respectable...i knew it wasn't all Chavis' fault
Posted by teeMike
In my mind, I'm already there.
Member since Feb 2007
7574 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:37 am to
Agreed...That score should not have counted and it would have looked better. (although Tigers still would not have beat the spread)
Posted by coloradoBengal
Member since Sep 2007
32608 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Agreed...That score should not have counted and it would have looked better. (although Tigers still would not have beat the spread)



I had an Under 17.5 on UW. That play cost me.
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
12985 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:43 am to
quote:

I'm sure this has been talked about but I just watched the game again on DVR and on the last play the right tackle definitely moves back before the snap. Just an observation.


It has been talked about, but you're right. It actually happened a few times throughout the game typically when the RT was matched up against Alem.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73138 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:43 am to
udub's right tackle false started on several plays i noticed
Posted by steelreign
Deridder
Member since Jan 2009
11086 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:43 am to
quote:

I'm sure this has been talked about but I just watched the game again on DVR and on the last play the right tackle definitely moves back before the snap. Just an observation.


From what I remember, that dude jumped early on the last 2 plays.
Posted by The Ramp
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2004
12188 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:44 am to
Every penalty they called against UW, some obnoxious UW fan would scream "ESPN wants LSU to win!"

Posted by TigerTailsSoup
Member since Sep 2005
10830 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:45 am to
the refs wanted the game to end because the people at Buffalo Wild Wings were ready to go home so he didn't call it
Posted by Snarf Snarf
Thundera
Member since Jul 2009
524 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:47 am to
quote:

ESPN wants LSU to win


Is that why the camera never left the UW sideline...shite still pisses me off
Posted by The Ramp
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2004
12188 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 10:48 am to
In over 150 games attended, that may be the stupidest fan ever.
Posted by murdock
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
145 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 11:02 am to
I teased LSU down to -10 that play cost me as well!!
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
36895 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 11:03 am to
quote:

although Tigers still would not have beat the spread)


what did the spread end up being? i thought it was right at 14.
Posted by murdock
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
145 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 11:04 am to
Anywhere from 16-18
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
33919 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 11:05 am to
The right tackle was moving early on just about every play and getting away with it. Even some of the UW fans I talked to admitted it.

They definitely got the home calls, which is saying a lot considering how much they were penalized on top of that. It should have been a lot worse for them.

They were also spearing, especially when JJ tucked and ran...they were gunning for him. I guess that is the mentality Nick Holt brought with him from USC.
Posted by murdock
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
145 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 11:06 am to
The over/under was 47....47 is the total amount of points for both teams...last play was 7 more points causing the game to "go over" total of 47.
Posted by LawDawg1
Member since Apr 2009
513 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 11:15 am to

Good God. You're still complaining about the refs? LSU easily got just as many calls, if not more, that favored them. Did any of it affect the outcome? NO.

Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
12985 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 11:16 am to
quote:

LSU easily got just as many calls, if not more


The officiating was just plain bad.

But out of curiosity, other than the no-call on Chad Jones, what other penalties did LSU get away with?
Posted by steelreign
Deridder
Member since Jan 2009
11086 posts
Posted on 9/11/09 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Did any of it affect the outcome?


It might not have affected the outcome of the game, but it did affect the score. That last TD by UW shouldn't have counted because the false start penalty.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram