Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Expectations for Wash. game as high as Weekend at Bernie's II?

Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:46 am
Posted by SECbanter
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2011
23 posts
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:46 am
Expectations. What were yours heading into the LSU Tigers’ 2012 campaign? An undefeated season capped by a BCS national championship? Total domination of every opponent? A high-flying offense with QB Zach Mettenberger routinely throwing for 300+ yards?

After last week’s outing against North Texas, are your expectations for the Bayou Bengals unchanged or perhaps lowered just a bit? (Especially after watching Bama stomp Michigan. Yikes.) I must confess that I expected more from LSU in its season opener. Yes, I know they won 41-14, had a weird game week with Hurricane Isaac, used a vanilla game plan, and it’s tough to play your best against the likes of North Texas. But the game just wasn’t that fun to watch and I retired for the evening feeling underwhelmed.

Let’s face it. High expectations are often a prelude to disappointment. For example, all of us enjoyed the 1985 film, Teen Wolf, a smart movie about an awkward teen who inherits a werewolf’s traits after it attacks him. We eagerly anticipated the sequel – 1987’s Teen Wolf Too. But, alas, it sucked.

Who didn't love Weekend at Bernie’s, the 1989 movie about two insurance company losers who pretend their boss isn’t dead so they can carry on the party at his house in the Hamptons? Then came Weekend at Bernie’s II, the sequel in 1993. Though our expectations were through the roof, alas, it sucked.

Our LSU Fighting Tigers have a golden opportunity to avoid being a Teen Wolf Too, Weekend at Bernie’s II, and every other bad sequel that was ever made. Call me a “negatiger,” but I thought the Tigers looked disinterested and removed from the start of that North Texas game.

Expect that to change this Saturday night in Death Valley. With the Washington Huskies of the Pac-12 visiting Tiger Stadium before a live national audience on ESPN, the sequel to the Tigers’ week one performance should deliver. Will a Pac-12 defense be up for bruising LSU running backs Kenny Hilliard and company? This is a defense that surrendered 199 rushing yards to San Diego State last week, so expect Les Miles to pound the rock on the ground.

Will the Huskies’ offense – relying heavily on quarterback Keith Price and perhaps a few other contributors, none of whom I care to research at this point in the article – actually be able to keep the stout LSU defense off balance?

As a motivational tool, Washington coach Steve Sarkisian had a live tiger attend the team's practice on Tuesday. According to one Washington player, the idea was to “eliminate distractions” and prepare the team for its trip to Baton Rouge. Conducting practice in the presence of a live bengal tiger is just the trick to eliminate distractions. Everyone knows that.

I can’t figure out whether I expect LSU to steamroll the Huskies or just hope that it happens. Do I expect Zach Mettenberger to develop a pocket presence or hope that he will? Expect the Tigers to devour a non-conference opponent on a Saturday night on the bayou or hope they will? It’s probably a little of both in the second week of a long college football season.

LSU’s road to redemption continues this Saturday night with an expectation-fulfilling win.

Prediction:

LSU 47
Washington 17

Geaux Tigers!
Posted by dandan
Member since Nov 2007
4340 posts
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:51 am to
I still think the team will run the table but Bama looks to be tougher that I thought.

However Auburn, FLorida, and South Carolina all looked pretty weak and I was a little concerned about playing at AU and UF but now not so much.

Still need a couple more weeks to see who's who though.
Posted by sfont154839
Luling, LA
Member since Nov 2007
909 posts
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Call me a “negatiger,” but I thought the Tigers looked disinterested and removed from the start of that North Texas game.


How pumped up do you really have to be to play North Texas, alas a glorified scrimmage?

Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84768 posts
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:52 am to
quote:

We eagerly anticipated the sequel – 1987’s Teen Wolf Too. But, alas, it sucked.


frick you, Teen Wolf Too has aged very well
Posted by clamdip
Rocky Mountain High
Member since Sep 2004
17857 posts
Posted on 9/6/12 at 11:55 am to
Posted by Child of the Missip
Member since May 2012
1522 posts
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Let’s face it. High expectations are often a prelude to disappointment. For example, all of us enjoyed the 1985 film, Teen Wolf, a smart movie about an awkward teen who inherits a werewolf’s traits after it attacks him. We eagerly anticipated the sequel – 1987’s Teen Wolf Too. But, alas, it sucked.


Stopped reading after this
Posted by tigerbait16
Member since Apr 2011
729 posts
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Weekend at Bernie's II?

it was better than the first
Posted by cattus
Member since Jan 2009
13394 posts
Posted on 9/6/12 at 12:35 pm to
you a writer?
Posted by kurtbuc
New Orleans, LA
Member since Nov 2011
78 posts
Posted on 9/6/12 at 4:01 pm to
Correction: Scott Howard aka Teen Wolf did not "inherit a werewolf's traits after it attacked him." The werewolf trait was inherited from his father, who never attacked his own kid...to my knowledge.
RANTARD 80s movie FAIL.
Posted by Bodyaid
Slidell
Member since Feb 2009
392 posts
Posted on 9/6/12 at 6:21 pm to
Movie board
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram