there is no anti LSU bias in the SEC office or among bowls.
I wouldn't go as far as calling it anti bias LSU than I'd call it sticking up for the SECCG loser. While I don't agree that losing the game should get you to a crappy bowl, that's the case currently.
The SEC talked, forced, whatever the case may be, the Cap. One bowl committee out of their already made decision to take A&M and take UGA. Then the dominos fell and subsequently threw off all the other SEC bowl games, maybe with the exception of the Gator.
The bowl committees are there for a reason, so let them pick the teams they want to invite and leave it at that.
Where did TN go in 2007? Where did Florida go in '09? South Carolina after they lost to Cam in the SECCG? It's almost always the Chick Fil A. Again, I don't agree with it, but that's the way it is currently. So why does the SEC, or Slive, feel the need to step in and mess with it? Because UGA played Bama tough? So did we last season. So did we this year.
Leave it to the committees.