Started By
Message
locked post

Brad Edwards take on rematch

Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:03 pm
Posted by Bamboozles
BR
Member since Jul 2008
2300 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:03 pm
Excerpt from the insider article on ESPN. In summary, Brad Edwards has this to say:

"To sum it all up: We're an Oklahoma State loss and a Stanford loss away from likely having LSU and Bama ranked No. 1 and No. 2 -- again. That could theoretically happen as soon as next week, if the Ducks take out the Cardinal and Texas Tech surprises the Cowboys."

Thats his two cents and odds of this happening are as good as can be

Posted by Geauxld Finger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
31657 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:04 pm to
so take what brad says...and the exact opposite will happen. this dude gets everything wrong.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

the Ducks take out the Cardinal


That's possible.

quote:

Texas Tech surprises the Cowboys


This is not. Texas Tech is coming off of two blowout loses. One of which was to Iowa State.
This post was edited on 11/7/11 at 3:06 pm
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
93677 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:05 pm to
I still don't see why Alabama gets a rematch while Oregon is left out while winning their conference.

Just a thought.
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29242 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

rematch


I just don't see how the winner of the game Saturday would be effectively punished for winning by having to play another game (SEC Championship) against another quality opponent while the loser would just get to win three games to get a rematch. It's one thing if it was a three point LSU win in Baton Rouge, but for Alabama to lose at home and then get a easier road just seem unfair.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

still don't see why Alabama gets a rematch while Oregon is left out while winning their conference.


Oh I agree. There is no way a team should be able to win a National Championship without winning their conference or even division. The whole scenario is ludicrous to me.
Posted by kensnippy
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2005
323 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:11 pm to
Not gonna happen. Although, I agree it's not fair to LSU for this to happen, the real reason we won't see a rematch is the rest of the country will not want to see an all SEC championship game. The voters will make sure someone else gets in above Bama.
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:13 pm to
The extra game will probably jump Oregon ahead of Bama in the final rankings.

If this was LSU, the loss wouldn't be bad. 3 point loss and on the road. LSU's SOS would come back in the end to help us out.

If Stanford/OSU lose...please let Boise in. I'd love for us to silence those annoying fricks who think they can stand to a elite team in the SEC.
This post was edited on 11/7/11 at 3:14 pm
Posted by TigerMan02
Member since Dec 2007
891 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:15 pm to
Prom i'm right with you, plus like people say" its when you lose" Both lost to #1, except Oregon was way earlier. The game was closer than the score ( I know its coming lol)
Posted by geauxturbo
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
4162 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

so take what brad says...and the exact opposite will happen. this dude gets everything wrong.


He's worse than the weatherman.
Posted by Tommy Patel
Member since Apr 2006
7558 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

I still don't see why Alabama gets a rematch while Oregon is left out while winning their conference.


i don't see how it happens either, but stranger things have happened. I want to see Oregon and Bama play
Posted by CarrolltonTiger
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2005
50291 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

I just don't see how the winner of the game Saturday would be effectively punished for winning by having to play another game (SEC Championship) against another quality opponent while the loser would just get to win three games to get a rematch. It's one thing if it was a three point LSU win in Baton Rouge, but for Alabama to lose at home and then get a easier road just seem unfair.


Even without the extra game, why should they get a do over so that we have to win 2 out of 2 and they get to split to get the crystal ball.
Posted by playaplaya
Member since Nov 2009
35 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:15 pm to
Karma is tough, BAMA will not be in New Orleans on January 9th as a participant.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Oh I agree. There is no way a team should be able to win a National Championship without winning their conference or even division. The whole scenario is ludicrous to me.

Conference/division championships are irrelevant. That's not a prerequisite for winning the NCAA basketball tournament. Why should it be for football? LSU's baseball team dudn't win the conference every time they won the College World Series.
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10411 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

Conference/division championships are irrelevant. That's not a prerequisite for winning the NCAA basketball tournament. Why should it be for football?


Perhaps you missed the part where Baseball and Basketball had a playoff system.
Posted by Bamboozles
BR
Member since Jul 2008
2300 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

The extra game will probably jump Oregon ahead of Bama in the final rankings.



currently that extra game would be a 5-4 UCLA which controls its destiny. Yup they would look world beaters if they whoop up on UCLA, right!!
Posted by gabe311
New Orleans
Member since Jun 2010
2039 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Karma is tough, BAMA will be in New Orleans on January 4th as a participant.


Sugar Bowl for the Gumps.
Posted by ColdDuck
BR via da Parish
Member since Sep 2006
2755 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:28 pm to
I think this is the first week he picked the correct #1 spot. He had Bama every other week. He is a Bama alum.... so he is just pimping his school.
Posted by TexasTiger1185
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
13069 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

I still don't see why Alabama gets a rematch while Oregon is left out while winning their conference.


This. If you can't be the best team in your conference how can you be the best team in the country?

Besides that Bama lost at home!!! not in Tiger Stadium, or at a neutral site. As for a rematch with Oregon, not gonna happen. Oregon got beaten handily by LSU at a neutral site already this season. I'm rooting for OKState to win out, no controversy and a good game.
Posted by chipd
Seattle
Member since Jul 2011
373 posts
Posted on 11/7/11 at 3:40 pm to
We might get a rematch, but it should not happen. Here is why;
College football is great because the regular season matters. When was the last time any body cared about a regular season NCAA basketball game. As imperfect as it is..the regular season IS the playoff, and it makes the games great. Is Bama the second best team? They probably are, but if they get to the NCG against LSU, they will have gotten there losing to LSU at home and not playing an SEC championship game, so they would have had an easier path. At least if you are going to have a losers bracket...make it harder than the winners bracket.
I was on the record before the game as being against a rematch regardless. I stand by it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram