Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Article on yahoo sports ncaa. . .

Posted on 4/19/10 at 7:53 pm
Posted by lyande1
p-ville
Member since Jun 2007
400 posts
Posted on 4/19/10 at 7:53 pm
There is an article about Les Miles on there but I cant click on it. My computer must be screwing up. Anyone read this? Can you link it?
Posted by Enigma
Member since Jan 2008
6713 posts
Posted on 4/19/10 at 7:55 pm to
LINK

Here ya go!
Posted by lyande1
p-ville
Member since Jun 2007
400 posts
Posted on 4/19/10 at 7:56 pm to
Appreciate it.
Posted by Tigahs
Member since Jan 2004
22836 posts
Posted on 4/19/10 at 8:04 pm to
Ouch, that's cold
Posted by msutiger
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2008
69573 posts
Posted on 4/19/10 at 8:30 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/12/23 at 8:41 am
Posted by el gato
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2005
2402 posts
Posted on 4/19/10 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Thats got to be the stupidest fricking thing Ive ever read


This.

The article was written by someone who is supposed to be a national writer for Rivals, and he is clueless. Louisiana, like the states of Texas, Florida, California, Ohio, Florida, is one of the top producers of college talent in the nation. Pre-1970 the idiot who wrote the story would be correct about LSU over-achieving, but since integration the talent available in Louisiana is enough to keep LSU consistently among the nation's top teams. (I will admit that recruiting that talent to LSU, and coaching it once it gets here is a completely different animal.)
Posted by Big Fat
"Fear the Hat" returns 2010
Member since Sep 2009
5404 posts
Posted on 4/19/10 at 9:30 pm to
50 years without a title is pretty bad.... just sayin. We were never an elite program as we have been the last decade.
Posted by el gato
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2005
2402 posts
Posted on 4/19/10 at 9:44 pm to
The landscape for SEC football completely changed once it integrated. Before 1970, you can spin LSU's football fortunes any way you want, but LSU has had access to nearly as much talent as any school in the country since then. If Florida, Florida State and Miami can shed their lack of a football pedigree and become national powers post-integration then LSU can, as well. You can even make an argument that, rather than overachieve this decade, LSU underachieved the previous two decades.
Posted by Big Fat
"Fear the Hat" returns 2010
Member since Sep 2009
5404 posts
Posted on 4/19/10 at 10:29 pm to
I would like to think we underachieved in the 80s and 90s. Couple decent teams in the late 80s and mid 90s but not top notch in general.
Posted by extremetigerfanatic
Denham Springs
Member since Oct 2003
5362 posts
Posted on 4/19/10 at 10:50 pm to
Michigan has had one title in how long?

I think the most retarded thing is the a hole from shreveport and his stupid arse question.

He should have just said, "You know we like to complain alot here in LA about our coach. Is there anything you can add to the fire? I always like to stir the pot!"
This post was edited on 4/19/10 at 10:56 pm
Posted by TigerJack8
Member since Sep 2009
161 posts
Posted on 4/20/10 at 2:09 am to
quote:

The landscape for SEC football completely changed once it integrated. Before 1970, you can spin LSU's football fortunes any way you want, but LSU has had access to nearly as much talent as any school in the country since then. If Florida, Florida State and Miami can shed their lack of a football pedigree and become national powers post-integration then LSU can, as well. You can even make an argument that, rather than overachieve this decade, LSU underachieved the previous two decades.

As long as we're keeping the top in-state talent we're not going anywhere.
This post was edited on 4/20/10 at 2:10 am
Posted by rchamp4
Member since Mar 2010
64 posts
Posted on 4/20/10 at 2:19 am to
i agree with pretty much everything he said except for the underachieve overachieve thing he answered that question earlier when he said we havent had a recruiting class worst that #11 since les arrived
Posted by TigerJack8
Member since Sep 2009
161 posts
Posted on 4/20/10 at 2:26 am to
Yeah, I do think we're probably underachieving (at least according to recruiting rankings) from 2008 til now. The quarterback situation has really hurt us. But still it hasn't been terrible, we're at least going to bowl games.
I am just saying we're not going to go back to the days of not making bowl games (90's) because we're going to keep the in-state talent. No more warrick dunn's running off to florida state or anywhere else.
This post was edited on 4/20/10 at 2:27 am
Posted by the LSUSaint
Member since Nov 2009
15444 posts
Posted on 4/20/10 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Thats got to be the stupidest fricking thing Ive ever read


What part did you find untrue?

It is true, if we don't back into that title game, Miles would be remembered that year for NOT getting us there by losing AT HOME to an underachieving Ark team.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram