- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2 things about the play at the plate
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:36 pm
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:36 pm
1. Fraleys leg hit the corner of the plate before the tag, but in the replay the catchers leg obscures view.
2. Anytime you apply the tag at the shoulder near the head, the runner is going to get the benefit of the doubt, regardless of the foot action at the plate.
2. Anytime you apply the tag at the shoulder near the head, the runner is going to get the benefit of the doubt, regardless of the foot action at the plate.
This post was edited on 5/25/16 at 11:39 pm
10
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:37 pm to southernelite
2 - yes
1 - no
1 - no
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:37 pm to southernelite
He was out but whatever.
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:38 pm to southernelite
quote:
Anytime you apply the tag at the shoulder near, the runner is going to get the benefit of the doubt, regardless of the foot action at the plate
Yep. Ump can't watch both when you tag high (but we did get a little lucky)
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:38 pm to southernelite
No
Yes
Yes
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:38 pm to southernelite
quote:
Anytime you apply the tag at the shoulder near, the runner is going to get the benefit of the doubt, regardless of the foot action at the plate.
I feel like it is actually more common to call the runner safe when this happens.
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:39 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
#3.........he was called safe......don't care.......
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:39 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Apparently not
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:39 pm to southernelite
1) you really can't tell either way based off the replay. It was very close
2) yup
3) based on the rules it was illegal for him to block the plate so frick it anyway
2) yup
3) based on the rules it was illegal for him to block the plate so frick it anyway
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:40 pm to southernelite
It was very close. The view from behind is inconclusive. He had it blocked, but his foot gave way. I'm not sure if Fraley's foot pushed to the corner of the plate before the tag. You can't blame the ump no matter how he called that. The tag and the plate were too far apart to see such a close play.
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:41 pm to Penrod
The call stands.
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:41 pm to southernelite
Call could have gone either way. We got lucky.
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:42 pm to quail man
If it was obstructed how do you know he touched the plate? XRAY VISION?
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:42 pm to Tiger Ryno
Makes up for so many previous hosings we've gotten over the years.
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:43 pm to southernelite
Yeah yeah yeah ,but no Deke
Posted on 5/25/16 at 11:45 pm to southernelite
1. He was called safe.
2. That's all I care about.
Iffy calls happen throughout the game and they usually equal out by the end of the game. That one just happened to be in a huge spot.
2. That's all I care about.
Iffy calls happen throughout the game and they usually equal out by the end of the game. That one just happened to be in a huge spot.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News