Started By
Message

re: Protein 30 mins after a workout, yay or nay?

Posted on 6/21/17 at 2:56 pm to
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33253 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Care to share something showing this. A whole foods plant based diet is highly regarded as one that is best in the prevention and reversing of heart disease
For starters, your body was not evolved/designed to a mostly-plant diet. Second, I think it's likely true that switching from the absurd and toxic "American diet" to a plant-based diet would almost necessarily lower risk to heart disease and other ailments. However, that is NOT the same thing as saying a plant-based diet is preferable to a proper omnivorous diet (with a heavy lean to animal fats and proteins.) For one, the bioavailability of many micro-nutrients is less in plants than in meats. If I had to go whole hog (pardon the pun) one way or the other, I would choose all-animal over all-plant 1000 times out of 1000.
Posted by thibtigerfan
Thibodaux
Member since Aug 2006
2460 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

You only get your carbs from plant sources btw

touche'
I get them from unprocessed/ minimally processed plant sources
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32015 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Haha, like I have said before, nutrient timing is minuscule in the grand scheme of things.




I was not trying to make a joke at you.. i do drink 2 scoops of protein immediately after i lift every single day.... i just forgot mine today and was making a joke
Posted by thibtigerfan
Thibodaux
Member since Aug 2006
2460 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

some fiber to make it seem (metabolically) as if there is slightly less sugar


We are saying the same thing
The food as a whole is processed differently in the body

Not all fruits are sugar bombs also
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
30924 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 3:24 pm to


Sorry to say it thib, big scrub is right. Body does not know the difference between fruit or chocolate. Do some reaseach on if it fits your macros style diets. Only real difference is fruitose goes straight to replenish liver glycogen which is actually worse than just an insulin spike.

This is speaking from a weight loss stand point only.

From a health stand point sugar is sugar but preservatives in the chocolate will be much worse for your overall health. But still sugar is sugar,m.
Posted by thibtigerfan
Thibodaux
Member since Aug 2006
2460 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

For starters, your body was not evolved/designed to a mostly-plant diet

oh it wasn't? Please tell me how so. Meat was only available WHEN one was killed. That took days and/or weeks of hunting where humans had to survive on fruits and veggies that they gathered.

quote:

However, that is NOT the same thing as saying a plant-based diet is preferable to a proper omnivorous diet (with a heavy lean to animal fats and proteins.)


It is preferable according to the ACS (American Cancer Society) as well as most doctors.

quote:

I would choose all-animal over all-plant 1000 times out of 1000.


Again to each their own. I prefer the exact opposite
Posted by thibtigerfan
Thibodaux
Member since Aug 2006
2460 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 3:32 pm to
Forks Over Knives

Read here. Let me know if you have heard of someone dieing from eating too much organic fruit.

The body benefits from the micronutrients and the fiber. A naturally occurring sugar (while not going to extremes with it) are not bad from you.

For weight loss maybe a different story, but for overall health
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33253 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

We are saying the same thing
Maybe, but
quote:

The food as a whole is processed differently in the body
This makes it seem maybe not. The sugar is not processed differently. The fiber just makes the headline sugar's number have slightly less metabolic impact. And then the presence of micro-nutrients asks the eater to make a judgment call on the tradeoff of sugar for nutrients.
quote:


Not all fruits are sugar bombs also
You're right. I limit my fruit mostly to berries. But even something as seemingly elemental as an apple is a massive sugar bomb and IMO a net health negative.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
30924 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 4:44 pm to
No thank you, you mentioned meat and cancer, no offense but you lost all credibility when it comes to healthy eating. You may know how to get people lean as evidenced by your own progress but no offense but you don't know jack shite about cancer, meat or health in general if you believe meat causes cancer.


Btw cancer is fueled by glucose, only glucose and without it the cancer cell dies. This is a fact that can not be disputed. So how would eating items that contain glucose help prevent cancer?

All of the studies that show this were paid for by the grain and big farm industry. The government wants you to eat like that because there is not enough meat for everyone to eat pounds of it.

And yea we gathered and feasted. But we only gathered berries and only enough to provide energy. We feasted nightly on meat during primal times or atleast every few days. But the majority of our calories were from fat and protein, not fruits and veggies.

And since when did doctors get an education on nutrition?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33253 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

oh it wasn't? Please tell me how so. Meat was only available WHEN one was killed. That took days and/or weeks of hunting where humans had to survive on fruits and veggies that they gathered.
The "fruits and veggies" you are referring to didn't exist during our hunter/forager days. It would have been subsistence on nuts/berries/etc. A big sugar-bomb apple was not a thing. And the vast majority of vegetables you probably have in mind (lettuces, cabbages, broccoli, cauliflower, etc.) literally have only existed for the past 1500-2000 years. They are all human-bred from one weed (brassica).
quote:


It is preferable according to the ACS (American Cancer Society) as well as most doctors.
You can feel free to rely on these "advocacy" groups which have proven more and more to be nothing more than horribly politicized shill organizations. The AHA and ADA are particularly bad offenders and have given out decades of highly destructive advice that has poisoned several generations of Americans.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33253 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

Let me know if you have heard of someone dieing from eating too much organic fruit.
I'm sure plenty of diabetics and heart patients were quite negatively affected by their over-consumption of fruits and fruit juices. Their claim that "sugar derived in whole foods is not an issue" is ludicrous. But in any event, just know: your body LITERALLY has no biological requirement for ingested carbohydrate. None. So, any ingested carbohydrate inherently indicates the eater making a risk/reward tradeoff between pleasure and health. And that's fine. But let's not act like it's not true.
Posted by thibtigerfan
Thibodaux
Member since Aug 2006
2460 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 7:02 pm to
I agree that we can survive without carbohydrates. But I believe a diet high in natural unprocessed carbohydrates is healthier than one high in animal fat
Posted by thibtigerfan
Thibodaux
Member since Aug 2006
2460 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 7:06 pm to
777 you may not agree with me

But my credibility is not in question when it comes to health.

Show me a more reputable organization that states that unprocessed organic fruits and veggies cause cancer.


I can send lots of articles stating that meat contains carcinogens.

You're right. I do know how make diet plans to get people lean. But I also know what foods make them healthier too. I know the right way to diet so that you can combo them as well.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
30924 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 7:21 pm to
Well kinda over reacted and shouldn't have questioned your credibility when it comes to health and I 100% agree that fruits and veggies are healthy due to micronutrients. But those studies that show meats have carcingions are either flawed by using low grade meat or flawed due to who paid for the study.

But when it comes to cancer you are way off. I'm sure you will pull the China study up, but its flaws like crazy. In general meat can not cause cancer as cancer lives off of glucose. Low grade meats with preservatives and other shite maybe can but pure grass fed beef, free range chicken and wild caught seafood can not, will not and is not possible to cause cancer, spread cancer etc

Cancer must have glucose to live, period. It's why you should go on a zero carb diet if you get cancer. Should also take dnp in low dose due to its ability to control insulin and glucose release at a cellular level and to perform this and other actions in the mitochondria. FDA would never allow dnp to be suggested, doesn't mean it doesn't work. Ada would never suggest a zero carb diet as there is no money in beating cancer that away. If you do anything please be extremely skeptical of any nutritional information any government agency or any general practitioner gives you that isn't into athletics, bodybuilding etc.
Posted by tke_swamprat
Houma, LA
Member since Aug 2004
9738 posts
Posted on 6/21/17 at 7:42 pm to
I believe that the most prescribed diet to cancer patients is the Mediterranean diet.

I don't see how eating fruits and veggies is a bad thing regardless of fructose in fruit.

If you are eating wild caught fish and deer that's very different than eating chicken and beef from Wal mart.
Posted by thibtigerfan
Thibodaux
Member since Aug 2006
2460 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:31 am to
quote:

In general meat can not cause cancer as cancer lives off of glucose. Low grade meats with preservatives and other shite maybe can but pure grass fed beef, free range chicken and wild caught seafood can not, will not and is not possible to cause cancer, spread cancer etc


You still have not provided any study to show this. I do agree that grass fed beef, etc. are better. I never said I don't eat meat, I just stated that from plenty of studies meats do contain carcinogens.


Also, we can argue that other studies are gaining funding from the meat industry. That outlook goes both ways.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 9:34 am
Posted by thibtigerfan
Thibodaux
Member since Aug 2006
2460 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:32 am to
quote:

I don't see how eating fruits and veggies is a bad thing regardless of fructose in fruit. If you are eating wild caught fish and deer that's very different than eating chicken and beef from Wal mart


Exactly spot on. If you are going kill and clean the meat yourself, it will be a lot healthier than what you are buying.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
30924 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:45 am to
not trying to be a dick, but look it up. DO some research on how cancer survives, how it thrives and do your own conclusions. The studies you are using also use corolation to try and draw a conclusion. Corolation does not equal causation.
Posted by tke_swamprat
Houma, LA
Member since Aug 2004
9738 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:54 am to
Cancer likes acidity and both meat and refined sugars cause a high acidity environment so they both suck!
Posted by Bonkers119
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2015
10058 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 9:59 am to
There's a new Documentary on Netflix called "What is Health", which draws the corellation between Meat and dairy, and cancer. All the meat we consume has some level of carcinogens in them.

Dairy also isn't good for you, because of the amount of hormones that are in it. 78% of the world is Lactose intolerant for a reason. Consuming dairy after infancy is not a natural thing, it's just something that the Dairy farmers have pushed on the American Public.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 10:00 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram