- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/9/13 at 2:37 pm to CBandits82
Then there are games for that. There are plenty of games that can tell a story and just do that. But the games I mentioned are probably the most played multiplayer FPS games on the console market. There is no reason for a campaign. In fact, I would be okay if they poured more content onto the disc as purely MP, then let you DL a campaign for $10 if you really wanted to.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 2:39 pm to The Sad Banana
:JIMP: shut up and take my money
quote:
The Division is inspired by Operation Dark Winter and Directive 51, real-world events which "revealed how vulnerable we've become"; society has become "fragile" and "complex". In the game, a disease that spreads on Black Friday causes the United States to collapse in 5 days.[2] The player is part of an unconfirmed group that was established to combat the threat and do whatever it takes to "save what remains" in a massive multiplayer online situation, putting them against friends, AI and other players.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 2:40 pm to jefforize
MOTPTSARPG
Posted on 7/9/13 at 2:41 pm to The Sad Banana
quote:
There is no reason for a campaign.
Of course there is if someone wants to play Battlefields storyline.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 2:43 pm to The Sad Banana
I think you could replace campaigns with something like COD did with the COOP missions. Seems like it would be a lot less burdening on the developers, but you could still get a sense of story as context for the MP.
I agree that for the latest military FPSs, the campaigns seem very "tacked on" and IMO aren't necessary.
I agree that for the latest military FPSs, the campaigns seem very "tacked on" and IMO aren't necessary.
This post was edited on 7/9/13 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 7/9/13 at 2:50 pm to taylork37
That's why I am not that excited about BF4, looks awesome but how much will I play it? Probably not a lot
Posted on 7/9/13 at 2:55 pm to jefforize
quote:
omguh but wut happens when a hurricane comes thru and i have no power for 7 days and want to play the Division THANKS UBISOFT.
hey im pretty sure i wrote that MFerPosted on 7/9/13 at 3:00 pm to taylork37
quote:
the campaigns seem very "tacked on" and IMO aren't necessary.
what was the last military FPS game that didn't have a campaign that felt "tacked on"?
This post was edited on 7/9/13 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 7/9/13 at 3:03 pm to jeff5891
great question...
COD 4 maybe....its really hard to remember many.
COD 4 maybe....its really hard to remember many.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 3:06 pm to taylork37
This game looks pretty awesome. Footage at E3 was off the chain.
The whole still being able to interact with your iPad or computer when you're not actually playing is sweet
The whole still being able to interact with your iPad or computer when you're not actually playing is sweet
This post was edited on 7/9/13 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 7/9/13 at 3:09 pm to stout
quote:
Ubisoft has already gone down the DRM train with Uplay on PC. They reversed some of it due to backlash but people are naive to think the big publishers like EA and Ubisoft have just given up on it. They will find a way to get everyone on board with it.
Uplay just doesn't bother me like it does others. Steam is my preference but it doesn't hurt my game play experience.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 3:12 pm to Mr Gardoki
Seriously? Uplay is the worst platform out there. Way worse than Origin has ever thought about being.
I also hate having to log into Uplay through Steam if I bought one of their games on Steam just for their DRM. It's cumbersome and has given me issues in the past.
I also hate having to log into Uplay through Steam if I bought one of their games on Steam just for their DRM. It's cumbersome and has given me issues in the past.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 3:13 pm to jeff5891
quote:Medal of Honor 2010.
what was the last military FPS game that didn't have a campaign that felt "tacked on"?
Posted on 7/9/13 at 3:14 pm to Mr Gardoki
quote:Are you saying that because you don't play online multiplayer?
That's why I am not that excited about BF4, looks awesome but how much will I play it? Probably not a lot
Posted on 7/9/13 at 3:14 pm to The Sad Banana
He's saying that because it looks more like BF 3.5
Posted on 7/9/13 at 3:14 pm to stout
Everything I have on uplay is just on uplay. All I have done is play AC on there but I just logged in like normal and played.
Posted on 7/9/13 at 3:16 pm to The Sad Banana
quote:
Are you saying that because you don't play online multiplayer?
yes, the game looks awesome. It does have a chance at being bf3.5 like stout said
Posted on 7/9/13 at 3:16 pm to stout
And it might be. That's fine with me. What else can they do to it but build on their success and support it? There is room for another game. And from some of the things I've read, DICE is shaking up some of the class abilities and customization to give even more flexibility to the players. It seems like something Battlefield fans will appreciate.
But, this isn't a BF thread...
But, this isn't a BF thread...
Posted on 7/9/13 at 4:31 pm to stout
LOL Xbox
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News