- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: don't see what the big deal about no man's sky is
Posted on 8/17/16 at 1:20 pm to DoUrden
Posted on 8/17/16 at 1:20 pm to DoUrden
quote:
didn't care for it at first but need to give it another shot after all the patches.
yea I played the preview before it was released, didn't care for it.
the patches have improved it immensely, especially the planet landing one. didn't even realize aliens would be in it till that 2.2 patch mentioned them.
0
Posted on 8/17/16 at 1:30 pm to Carson123987
quote:
honestly, id been waiting for you to flip sides ever since you bought it
with how fast you flip flop on games, i knew it had to be coming for NMS
not gonna lie, I kinda saw it coming when I bought it. bought it more for long term future updates investment and wanting to take part in a unique experience on console.
I'm cool giving a game a chance and jumping on the hype train. if it doesn't suck me in pretty fast I'll jump off in a heart beat. the downside being I've blown good money on those over hyped trains. but I'm ok with that, count them as learning experiences. plus lots of those overhyped games just need good updates to fulfill the hype or become a more playable game. at which point I'll go back and not regret buying it.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 1:47 pm to sicboy
quote:
I just don't understand your crusade. It's like you've been jilted.
quote:
Sean Murray's extremely vague remarks about his own game and intentionally not talking about the game's features would be absolute red flags with any big developer. But nahhh, they are innocent indie devs with a big dream.
There was no way that they could live up to the hype and speculation but they did absolutely NOTHING to deny any claims and possible features in the game or admit their lies, whether unintentional or not, all of them vague.
Sean Murray's purpose for being so vague was to let us discover everything but he really knew that his game wasn't shite but he still wanted all the money.
People love to blast Ubisoft (myself included), but NMS is immune because it's an indie developer. no sir.
i cant wait for Sean's next big letter to fans
if Deus Ex sucks when it's released next tuesday, yall can troll me all yall want
Posted on 8/17/16 at 2:00 pm to Carson123987
I think some reviewers were being generous in giving it a 6. An attempt to stave off at least some of the sick fanboys.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 2:06 pm to JombieZombie
I agree. the sean murray apologists are hilarious
Posted on 8/17/16 at 2:32 pm to hawgfaninc
It took a lot of time for Elite Dangerous to get there though. The first version of ED was nothing more than a glorified trucking sim with the occasional dogfight. I'm not defending NMS by saying ED was crap at launch, because at least Frontier Games released it as a $30 Alpha/Beta/Whatever the shite they call early games these days, then they had another $30 upgrade when Horizons came out (which I still need to get). The current version of NMS is a beta. It's no where near finished, and it's a shame it was priced at $60. It's a $30-40 game in it's current state - tops. Doesn't mean you can't get $60+ worth of enjoyment out of it, but for the majority of players it is not worth it yet.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 2:32 pm to Carson123987
quote:
the sean murray apologists are hilarious
I'll be the first to admit, the guy sucks
I can definitely understand why people aren't exactly happy with the game, but I'm enjoying it, but I just think it's awesome how I haven't been on a planet that's been anything like another one I've been one, granted, I've only been one 35-40 of them so far.
Improvements can definitely be made, but to say it's a shite game I think is going to far, but Murray and the uber fans more than anyone else definitely hyped it up to something that it was never going to be.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 2:38 pm to cincyykid
It's a cool game but pretty "basic bitch" right now. I look forward to mutliplayer.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 3:16 pm to RussianFromLSU
quote:
I look forward to mutliplayer.
Everyone says this but the game is so massive how often are you going to actually run in to anyone?
Posted on 8/17/16 at 3:38 pm to SG_Geaux
I don't see why people would want to do multiplayer in this type of game anyway.
If you just like to explore, you'd get wiped out every 5 seconds by cheesers who exploited the game to get a max ship and weapons and just want to mess with people. Sounds like a real blast...
If you just like to explore, you'd get wiped out every 5 seconds by cheesers who exploited the game to get a max ship and weapons and just want to mess with people. Sounds like a real blast...
Posted on 8/17/16 at 4:26 pm to The Pirate King
quote:It would be an awesome game if you could create factions and had a functioning economy.
If you just like to explore, you'd get wiped out every 5 seconds by cheesers who exploited the game to get a max ship and weapons and just want to mess with people. Sounds like a real blast...
Posted on 8/17/16 at 4:33 pm to Scruffy
E.V.E.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 4:37 pm to DoUrden
Exactly.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 4:40 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
Pirate King
Most people don't like it. It's not a big deal.
This post was edited on 8/17/16 at 4:48 pm
Posted on 8/17/16 at 4:43 pm to Carson123987
quote:This.
just don't understand your crusade. It's like you've been jilted.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 4:54 pm to DownSouthCrawfish
Anyone who watched the videos leading up to this would expect exactly what the game turned out to be.
Also I'm not getting any specifics on what the game is missing that they were promised, and how Murray lied to them.
This game might be disappointing from a PC perspective, but from a console perspective, this experience blows anything else comparable out of the water.
The only thing that comes close is Mass Effect and its 100 year load times between each area. Even it has a lot of the same problems as NMS relative to generic locations and buildings.
Also I'm not getting any specifics on what the game is missing that they were promised, and how Murray lied to them.
This game might be disappointing from a PC perspective, but from a console perspective, this experience blows anything else comparable out of the water.
The only thing that comes close is Mass Effect and its 100 year load times between each area. Even it has a lot of the same problems as NMS relative to generic locations and buildings.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 5:06 pm to The Pirate King
quote:Really? I remember the comments about how two friends may never meet on a planet because the universe is too vast, not because there was no multiplayer.
Anyone who watched the videos leading up to this would expect exactly what the game turned out to be.
quote:You shut your whore mouth.
The only thing that comes close is Mass Effect and its 100 year load times between each area. Even it has a lot of the same problems as NMS relative to generic locations and buildings.
This post was edited on 8/17/16 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 8/17/16 at 5:56 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
but from a console perspective, this experience blows anything else comparable out of the water.
Guessing you haven't played elite dangerous?
From the little bit I've played of elite last night and today, it's a lot more in depth and realistic compared to NMS. If you want kid friendly simplicity, NMS is for you.
Posted on 8/17/16 at 5:56 pm to Scruffy
Posted on 8/17/16 at 6:02 pm to cincyykid
The game sucks. If it were 20 that would be reasonable
This post was edited on 8/17/16 at 6:02 pm
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News