Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Lagers and ales

Posted on 2/17/10 at 1:46 am
Posted by ThePlumber
NOLA
Member since Jul 2005
970 posts
Posted on 2/17/10 at 1:46 am
Why is lager so popular throughout the world? It seems like in most countries I've been to, and apparently in plenty of others I haven't, the most widely consumed beer is always a lager.

I can think of a couple countries that probably consume more ale, e.g. Belgium and Ireland, but the overwhelming majority seem to love lager. In my experience, ales are generally much more interesting.

Which do you prefer?
Posted by lsubeer
Denver
Member since Sep 2008
1233 posts
Posted on 2/17/10 at 2:06 am to
alesover lagers...but I drink stouts....
Posted by Dallas Tiger
Dallas
Member since Mar 2006
15080 posts
Posted on 2/17/10 at 10:18 am to
Lagers are bland and so appeal to the lowest common denominator...aka McDonalds. I too prefer Ales which have a much more complex flavor profile due to the top fermenting yeast strains used.
Posted by borabora
Member since Feb 2010
404 posts
Posted on 2/17/10 at 3:03 pm to
i much prefer an ale
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
26957 posts
Posted on 2/17/10 at 3:19 pm to
Lagers began as a refreshing beverage. Meant to be light to drink in the hotter months. Beer was consumed in dark ages I believe instead of water because water supplies were always contaminated. Beer was safer due to the alcohol. There it began. Ales came about as a way to ship beer to India I believe. Hence IPA India Pale Ale... They were bitter so unable to take over the place of Lager beer.

I am and always will be more into Belgians and wheats. Ales are just too damn bitter for me. Just a preference thing. I cannot appreciate the complexity people speak of because the IBU's are usually too high. Sierra Nevada Pale Ale is the one that I can usually tolerate.

Need a beer snob to confirm my half-assed history lesson.
Posted by Fratastic423
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
5990 posts
Posted on 2/17/10 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Lagers began as a refreshing beverage. Meant to be light to drink in the hotter months. Beer was consumed in dark ages I believe instead of water because water supplies were always contaminated. Beer was safer due to the alcohol. There it began. Ales came about as a way to ship beer to India I believe. Hence IPA India Pale Ale... They were bitter so unable to take over the place of Lager beer.

I am and always will be more into Belgians and wheats. Ales are just too damn bitter for me. Just a preference thing. I cannot appreciate the complexity people speak of because the IBU's are usually too high. Sierra Nevada Pale Ale is the one that I can usually tolerate.

Need a beer snob to confirm my half-assed history lesson.


Ales are the original beer style. There are only two types of beer- ales and lagers. Everything else is a subset of those two. Lagers started to be developed when brewers could ferment at a consistent low temp, something that for most of history was not available.

IPA's were developed for the trip from Britain to India, more hops and higher alcohol kept the traditional pale ale fresh.

So the Belgians and wheats that you like are ales just different styles than American or India Pale Ales.
The difference between lagers and ales comes from the type of yeast that is used. Lager yeast needs to ferment closer to 50 F and leaves residue at the bottom of the fermenter whereas ale yeast ferments closer to 65-75 F and leaves residue at the top. hence you hear Top-fermenting and bottom fermenting yeast.
This post was edited on 2/17/10 at 3:28 pm
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
26957 posts
Posted on 2/17/10 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

Lagers started to be developed when brewers could ferment at a consistent low temp, something that for most of history was not available.



Thought the first were kept in caves to ferment.

Ales were the first but began as a mead type wine correct??
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
26957 posts
Posted on 2/17/10 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

So the Belgians and wheats that you like are ales just different styles than American or India Pale Ales.


True. Main thing that turns me off from ales is the IBU's. When I say Belgians I am mainly talking wheats and wittes. Belgian tripels are OK but not my preferred. They are too expensive and are definitely not something you can enjoy a few of. Not with their ABV.

Anyone know of any new ones other than Hoegaarden, Paulaner, and Franziskaner???
Posted by Fratastic423
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
5990 posts
Posted on 2/17/10 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

Thought the first were kept in caves to ferment.


I have to be honest, I did not know this about the caves. Brewers were not trying to create lagers, just happened to do it since they could only brew in the winter, apparently. What we know as lagers today were really created with Pislner Urquell in the mid 1800's.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram