Started By
Message

re: Week 4 Start or Sit conundrums

Posted on 10/4/15 at 11:40 am to
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35245 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 11:40 am to
Thanks Gyno.
Posted by PurpleDrank18
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2011
4508 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 11:45 am to
Hill or Moncrief .5 PPR. Not really excited about either situation. Had Luck been active I'd be more comfortable with Moncrief. But Hill is splitting with Gio(even tho I think that's overblown and the disparity in snap count has just been due to gameflow). But even if we took Gio out of the picture, KC is a tough defense to run on regardless.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71937 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 11:49 am to
quote:

(even tho I think that's overblown and the disparity in snap count has just been due to gameflow).


nailed it


Id roll Hill

Sounds like you are pretty set at RB and WR if those two are your flex options. Just dont know which WR Hassellbeck fixates on. Could be Moncrief or it could be 4 other guys. Hill should get 15 touches at least, hope for a big play or a GL carry and it would be a win
Posted by AUtigerNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2011
17107 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 11:51 am to
Moncrief or d Martin?
Posted by PurpleDrank18
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2011
4508 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 11:54 am to
Yeah my gut wants to go Hill over Moncrief. Just worried another dud could sink me this week. I'm playing the 1b to my 1a in this league (IMO at least ha) so a loss is crucial. Already had Flacco shite the bed for me on a good matchup. If only Luck were healthy. Anyway, thanks for the thoughts.
Posted by PurpleDrank18
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2011
4508 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 12:12 pm to
Thank you for the reassurance, Gyno! Lol
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71937 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 12:13 pm to
Hell yea baby
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71937 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 2:22 pm to
Mate, appears I was off base with Ginn Jr. Hope you stuck to your guns
Posted by Goose
Member since Jan 2005
22275 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 3:14 pm to
I did thanks for helping me convince myself (even though Cecil Shorts and one of the others would have also been a good play)
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51614 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 4:06 pm to
I picked Gary Barnage. My bad.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71937 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 4:09 pm to
You're bad what mate

7 points through 1.5 quarters
Posted by CE Tiger
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
41583 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

I picked Gary Barnage.


I thought I was the sole rider of the Barnage Bus, welcome aboard
This post was edited on 10/4/15 at 4:11 pm
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51614 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 4:12 pm to
Fleener at 23
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71937 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 4:13 pm to
Tough call with hasselbeck going

In a way you could see him checking down all day to fleener (which he did)

Or you could see him buckshotting

GB will get some work, hold tight
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51614 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 4:15 pm to
Yeah. Either way they're both outscoring Rudolph
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51614 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:08 pm to
My mate
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
71937 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:11 pm to
That's why we let that shite play out

Mccown likes him, should be a solid option going forward
Posted by Byron Bojangles III
Member since Nov 2012
51614 posts
Posted on 10/4/15 at 6:14 pm to
He was a fill in option for Gronk
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram