Started By
Message
locked post

Should this get vetoed?

Posted on 11/6/13 at 9:07 pm
Posted by couv1217
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
3320 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 9:07 pm
Team 1 gets: MJD and Stafford
Team 2 gets: Moreno and Russell Wilson
Posted by AmosMosesAndTwins
Lake Charles
Member since Apr 2010
17886 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 9:08 pm to
No.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
39931 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 9:09 pm to
Why?
Posted by UHadMeAtMeatTornado
TX
Member since Aug 2012
273 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 9:09 pm to
Hecks no.

IMO...

Moreno > MJD
Stafford > Wilson
This post was edited on 11/6/13 at 9:10 pm
Posted by croxley
Who Dat Nation
Member since Jan 2009
399 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 9:10 pm to
No
Posted by couv1217
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2007
3320 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 9:11 pm to
Ok. Thanks
Posted by tween the hedges
Member since Feb 2012
20238 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 9:39 pm to
Seriously? Does your league veto every other trade?
This post was edited on 11/6/13 at 9:40 pm
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37132 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 9:42 pm to
How is this even a question?
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
26522 posts
Posted on 11/6/13 at 9:44 pm to
Absolutely not.

The only reason a trade should be vetoed is in cases of obvious collusion.

Stafford > Wilson
Moreno > MJD

I'm just guessing, but if this trade goes through will it hurt you in some way?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram