- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is this trade veto worthy
Posted on 9/1/15 at 6:54 pm
Posted on 9/1/15 at 6:54 pm
Yesterday the Joseph Randle owner proposes an offer to the Mcfadden owner for.... wait for it.
Mcfadden for Ben Watson.
Mcfadden owner also owns Jimmy. What's the publics opinion on this transaction?
Mcfadden for Ben Watson.
Mcfadden owner also owns Jimmy. What's the publics opinion on this transaction?
6
Posted on 9/1/15 at 6:55 pm to McCringleberryy
No why would it be?
Posted on 9/1/15 at 6:57 pm to tduecen
You don't think with the gap in talent, the situation of other players, that there's possible collusion going on?
Posted on 9/1/15 at 6:59 pm to McCringleberryy
not veto worthy but a very dumb trade imo
Posted on 9/1/15 at 6:59 pm to McCringleberryy
The other guy is just a moron
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:00 pm to McCringleberryy
Is there reason to believe these two owners are colluding a week before the season starts?
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:01 pm to McCringleberryy
quote:watson and mcfadden is a gap in talent? How is 34 year old watson that much before than oft-injured McFadden? Is it because it is the Saints and watson may be the 1st string TE?
You don't think with the gap in talent,
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:05 pm to tduecen
Watson isnt owned in 4 of my 12 man PPR leagues or my 14 team PPR league
As of today McFadden is in line to get the majority of carries in DAL
As of today McFadden is in line to get the majority of carries in DAL
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:06 pm to GynoSandberg
Which makes it a dumb trade but not veto worthy.
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:09 pm to drizztiger
It's borderline so stupid as to suggest collusion.
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:09 pm to GynoSandberg
It was known before today that Mcfadden was leading the charge in the backfield. The guys reasoning is he needs a back up TE for week 9 when Jimmy is on a bye. I think there's collusion. Eifert, Gates, Allen, Rudolph are all avaliable but this guy chooses to trade a possible starting RB behind a top 3 line. Just trying to understand any logic to this before I put that pussy on a chainwax.
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:11 pm to McCringleberryy
quote:Well that makes it even worse.
The guys reasoning is he needs a back up TE for week 9 when Jimmy is on a bye. I think there's collusion. Eifert, Gates, Allen, Rudolph are all avaliable
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:12 pm to McCringleberryy
McFadden won't even make it to week 9
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:12 pm to McCringleberryy
How many years has the league been around? What's the buy-in? HAve these guys made suspect trades before?
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:14 pm to drizztiger
there are dumb trades and there are trades that upset the integrity of a league. There is no rational explanation one could explain for making that trade, especially if
Trades are automatically pushed through in my league with no veto ability, but if I was commish id just throw the guys back on their respective teams and say try again
Yeah, id love to hear the rationale
quote:
Eifert, Gates, Allen, Rudolph are all avaliable
Trades are automatically pushed through in my league with no veto ability, but if I was commish id just throw the guys back on their respective teams and say try again
quote:
Just trying to understand any logic to this before I put that pussy on a chainwax.
Yeah, id love to hear the rationale
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:19 pm to GynoSandberg
It was vetod and is now
Ben Watson
Terrance Williams
Darren Mcfadden
Micheal Crabtree
I just feel like he's giving up Mcfadden up for no reason to the Randle owner. It's a bad move for the league to let this type of idiocracy to go on. Been around for 6 years, $150 buy in.
Ben Watson
Terrance Williams
Darren Mcfadden
Micheal Crabtree
I just feel like he's giving up Mcfadden up for no reason to the Randle owner. It's a bad move for the league to let this type of idiocracy to go on. Been around for 6 years, $150 buy in.
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:21 pm to McCringleberryy
Yea thats stupid. Veto
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:34 pm to McCringleberryy
glad i dont have to deal with that kind of shite in my league 
good luck mate
good luck mate
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:36 pm to McCringleberryy
That doesn't really change the trade at all. It just added two throwaway players.
ETA: I don't see how people would buy in for $150 just to throw it away like this.
ETA: I don't see how people would buy in for $150 just to throw it away like this.
This post was edited on 9/1/15 at 7:37 pm
Posted on 9/1/15 at 7:41 pm to McCringleberryy
Terrance Williams is the best player in that trade.
Is everybody just all of the sudden assuming that brittle DMcF is for the first time in a long time going to stay healthy? Nope. Dude is soft. No chance in hell he plays all season without missing time.
Is everybody just all of the sudden assuming that brittle DMcF is for the first time in a long time going to stay healthy? Nope. Dude is soft. No chance in hell he plays all season without missing time.
This post was edited on 9/1/15 at 7:43 pm
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News