- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 9/20/12 at 4:27 pm to Honkus
Thanks Honk and Thomas 
Posted on 9/20/12 at 4:37 pm to MrWiseGuy
Wiseguy works for me...
Posted on 9/20/12 at 4:38 pm to MrWiseGuy
i'll accept you if you vote to eliminate TOs
Posted on 9/20/12 at 4:39 pm to barry
Hmmmm.
Posted on 9/20/12 at 5:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
WESTBROOK OTB
Is he still OTB, and how much?
Posted on 9/20/12 at 6:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
the 2 have nothing to do with each other
They're not completely unrelated. assist/turnover ratio is still a recognized statistic, no?
Anyways I like rule changes that make the league more competitive, not less.
Posted on 9/20/12 at 6:17 pm to Honkus
I always hated turnovers, so id vote against.
Slow, check them players i listed. I'd do a two for one or one for one to get Westbrook. Westbrook is my dawg
I guess ill need to change this Holiday season shite i have for my sig
Slow, check them players i listed. I'd do a two for one or one for one to get Westbrook. Westbrook is my dawg
I guess ill need to change this Holiday season shite i have for my sig
This post was edited on 9/20/12 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 9/20/12 at 6:30 pm to fratmonster
quote:
Slow, check them players i listed. I'd do a two for one or one for one to get Westbrook. Westbrook is my dawg
Plus one
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:37 pm to Honkus
quote:
assist/turnover ratio is still a recognized statistic, no?
yeah but it's really only applicable to one position (point guard) and with the neo/o-guard, it's losing importance
quote:
I like rule changes that make the league more competitive, not less.
that's what i'm doing
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:38 pm to TthomasJR
i'd like to upgrade him. i have 5 keepers. 2:1
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
You can have Amare
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:43 pm to TthomasJR
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
i just like TOs bc it balances things out for guards. if we ditch TOs it'll make guards too valuable & decrease the importance of Fs/Cs. people will be loading up on guards for their flex. i dont wanna play in a league like that.
& i dont see how eliminating a category makes things more competitive. 1 less category to worry about while drafting/trading/making lineup decisions doesn't mean more competitive to me.
ETA: btw it doesnt reward complacency, it penalizes frick ups, which is how it should be.
& i dont see how eliminating a category makes things more competitive. 1 less category to worry about while drafting/trading/making lineup decisions doesn't mean more competitive to me.
ETA: btw it doesnt reward complacency, it penalizes frick ups, which is how it should be.
This post was edited on 9/20/12 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:49 pm to Honkus
quote:
it'll make guards too valuable & decrease the importance of Fs/Cs.
this isn't fantasy football
this is stat-based competition, not point-based competition. it's impossible for 1 position to become "too valuable"
quote:
people will be loading up on guards for their flex.
and they'll get killed in FG%, blocks, and rebounds
big men turn it over more than guards anyway
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:50 pm to Honkus
quote:
btw it doesnt reward complacency, it penalizes frick ups, which is how it should be.
TOs are a product of aggression, typically. that's a good thing
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
i dont think giving the ball to the other team is a good thing.
i think its a pretty important stat & to throw it out be some people "just don't like it" would be a bitch-move.
i think its a pretty important stat & to throw it out be some people "just don't like it" would be a bitch-move.
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:05 pm to Honkus
I just don't think it makes sense in fantasy. Turnovers punish a fantasy team for having alot of playmakers who play with the ball in there hands. Why?
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:06 pm to Honkus
we need to figure out a way to make FT% hold more weight to offset the "jumpshooter" effect
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
You can have DeMarcus 
Page 4 of 36
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News