Started By
Message

So Gary Johnson voters...

Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:29 pm
Posted by Goose
Member since Jan 2005
22275 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:29 pm
While I count myself as a Libertarian, I also don't understand why a 5% popular vote will legitimize a third party in this country. Ross Perot's Reform Party won 8.4% of the pop back in 1996 and couldn't legitimize. They had Buchanan, Nader, Trump, and Perot; but still couldn't gain any traction in Washington.
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
17084 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:30 pm to
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Posted by gamatt53
Member since Nov 2010
4934 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:31 pm to
Just putting this here for the Allepo shite posters

This post was edited on 11/8/16 at 1:32 pm
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:31 pm to
All votes matter
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30353 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:31 pm to
I thought they'd since changed the rules to dictate 5% gains you public funding from the Federal Election Commitee. It also gains them equal ballot access.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36563 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:32 pm to
Voting Johnson made my farts smell better. I can say all I want about the 5% and what not but I am just really glad I didn't vote trump or Hillary.

The equal ballets is a big deal since it's a massive pain in the arse to get on each state ballet
This post was edited on 11/8/16 at 1:33 pm
Posted by Goose
Member since Jan 2005
22275 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

All votes matter


I get it, but I just don't understand why a 5% popular vote will legitimize the Libertarian party more then finding some candidates with good charisma; that don't seem like morons.
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:34 pm to
Gary won't be the candidate again. He won it in 2012. He won it again in 2016. No one really paid that much attention. Once people started paying attention, his reputation was ruined. He will not get it in 2020.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83510 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:36 pm to
I want the GOP to shift to more libertarian candidates.

Them losing votes to the libertarian party would or should cause them to shift their focus.

Posted by Goose
Member since Jan 2005
22275 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:36 pm to
Would Rand Paul come back to the Libertarian party?
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5354 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

I also don't understand why a 5% popular vote will legitimize a third party


5 is the threshold for ballot access and matching funds

with a message that resonates with such a huge part of the electorate, and a candidate that comes across well, this could (eventually) be game changing

eta: easier ballot access frees up a lot of time and ground resources to campaign and get in the conversations earlier
This post was edited on 11/8/16 at 1:38 pm
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46173 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Gary won't be the candidate again. He won it in 2012. He won it again in 2016. No one really paid that much attention. Once people started paying attention, his reputation was ruined. He will not get it in 2020.


It's more about the party than GJ
Posted by BCMCubs
Colorado
Member since Nov 2011
22146 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

All votes matter

Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30353 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:37 pm to
2 consecutive elections at 5% would gain the Libertarians ballot access in all states. Also:

quote:

In terms of financing, 5 percent will radically change the Libertarian candidate’s hand in the next election. Indeed 5 percent is the milestone set by the Federal Election Commission to be eligible for the Presidential Election Campaign Fund’s grant. The amount of public funding available to the minor party candidate is based on the the ratio of the party’s popular vote in the preceding presidential election to the average popular vote of the two major party candidates in that election.


quote:

If either candidate can net 5 percent of the popular vote on Nov. 8, they’ll unlock up to $10 million in additional federal funding for future elections. That money could unleash more political power by enabling the Greens or Libertarians to reach more potential voters.
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:39 pm to
I don't think he will. He is in too deep with the Republicans. He is also Pro-life, which is against the ideals of Libertarians.
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46173 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

don't think he will. He is in too deep with the Republicans. He is also Pro-life, which is against the ideals of Libertarians.


No it isn't
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5354 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

against the ideals of Libertarians


there are plenty of pro-life folks in the LP
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101181 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

I also don't understand why a 5% popular vote will legitimize a third party in this country.


It doesn't. The best way to greater libertarianism is through a major party. Learn from Trump.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20839 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

While I count myself as a Libertarian, I also don't understand why a 5% popular vote will legitimize a third party in this country. Ross Perot's Reform Party won 8.4% of the pop back in 1996 and couldn't legitimize. They had Buchanan, Nader, Trump, and Perot; but still couldn't gain any traction in Washington.


1) It isn't 1996 anymore. People are ditching the red team and the blue team in greater numbers than ever.

2) Trump is absolutely a great anti-establishment candidate, but he is not a libertarian candidate. I hope he wins this thing, but I totally disagree with his trade protectionism, new entitlement proposals, and penchant for strong-man authoritarian leadership.

3) I hope that republicans in the future will emulate parts of Trump's model, but the reality is that the GOPe will probably slip right back into the driver's seat of the party. Even if Trump wins, I expect to see Paul Ryan and other garbage GOPe candidates at the top of the ticket in the future. The red half of the uniparty will continue to promote war, illegal immigration, and unsustainable entitlement spending. The Libertarian party being in the debates would give people, many of them suggestible idiots, the opportunity to vote for fiscal restraint without "hating gay people" or whatever the outrage du jour is leveled at republicans.
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
30353 posts
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

It doesn't. The best way to greater libertarianism is through a major party. Learn from Trump.


With 3 straight losses, the republican party will have to choose to go further right on social issues, or adopt more of the Libertarian approach to regain the people they are losing to that party. That's why it is important. A republican party that was fiscally conservative and socially liberal would be able to compete with the progressives. Social conservatism has been the death knell for the GOP.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram