While debatable, I think even Rantards are accurate when they say Miles left 4 NCs on the table
The problem with this mentality is that it ignores the fact that other teams can credibly make the same argument. LSU had a lot of talent, but so did other teams like Florida, Alabama, USC....
It's easy to say "if only" the offense, play calling or whatever was better we would have won. The is no way to prove it either way and while LSU had some very talented teams, so did several others. It's also easy to forget games that went LSU's way because of a bad call or bad offense by the other team.
We only scored 3 points vs Auburn in 06, its easy to say we could have won that game and even if we did, would we have beat Florida in the SEC CG? 2011 was a loaded team with a below avg offense that was outright pitiful in the BCS CG. Florida had the #6 offense in 2009. The avg 35.9 ppg, but only scored 13 in the SEC CG and lost by 19. Sure getting shutout and held to 5 FD's is embarrassing, but end result is the same as the 2009 SEC CG, a 3 TD loss to a great defense and great coaching staff that is tough to beat anytime, but more so in a rematch situation.
LSU could have won more titles, but so could Florida, USC, OU, Texas and frankly even Alabama could credibly argue they should have won the last 5.