So the fix is open borders with zero security? You think it will be cheaper when every doosh and his burkha wearing old lady can roll in drain money via service then roll out whenever they want? GFY on the idiot call little Rexy.
Do you believe it is reasonable for a suspect to wait 40 minutes while the police try to get a drug dog to the scene, then when the dog arrives on scene, it never alerts?
To the extent that there was a legitimate, pretextual traffic basis for the original
stop that does not involve race, it does not matter to Fourth Amendment analysis that the
officer’s underlying decision to make the stop may have subjectively been based on
considerations of race. See Whren, 517 U.S. at 813. Further, to the extent that other
factors in combination, and excluding race as a consideration, were sufficient to justify
reasonable suspicion for the stops, there is no Fourth Amendment violation. See United
States v. Manzo-Jurado, 457 F.3d 928, 934?36 (9th Cir. 2006). As discussed below,
however, such motivations do make a difference to the equal protection analysis
To be fair I don't think he said it was reasonable, just legal.
Illegal Aliens actually make a net positive contribution to the treasury
Which is more than you can say of the poor that live here legally
Additionally we benefit from their labor anyway. I get that we should want people to come here through the proper immigration channels but I just don't think illegal immigrants are the big boogeyman that everyone points them out to be.
It's just people who worship the law and think that it must be enforced at all times.
Further, they're not taking because they are unable to any means tested welfare progs.
In affirming this Court’s preliminary injunction, not only did the Ninth Circuit establish that the MCSO has no power to arrest such persons under such circumstances, it made clear that the MCSO has no power to detain them to investigate their immigration status. It is the existence of a suspected crime that gives a police officer the right to detain a person for the minimum time necessary to determine whether a crime is in progress. “[P]ossible criminality is key to any Terry investigatory stop or prolonged detention. . . . Absent suspicion that a ‘suspect is engaged in, or is about to engage in, criminal activity,’ law enforcement may not stop or detain an individual.” Ortega-Melendres II, 695 F.3d at 1000 (quoting United States v. Sandoval, 390 F.3d 1077, 1080 (9th Cir. 2004).88 In the absence, then, of any reasonable suspicion of a possible crime, there is no basis on which the MCSO can make an investigative detention—let alone an arrest— based only on the belief that someone is in the country without authorization. See also Arizona v. Johnson, 555 U.S. 323, 326 (2009) (holding that an investigatory stop is justified at its inception only when an officer “reasonably suspects that the person apprehended is committing or has committed a criminal offense”).
They get public education (Plyler v. Doe).
Parents do not pay property taxes into the system b/c they don't own property.
Therefore, 100% drain (and that does not even include the increased costs for their bilingual education).
They also use ERs and don't pay.
Really? You have to put your SS number on your income tax form. They don't have one.