and shame on Mike Gegenheimer.
Who thought it was a good idea to do this? Yes his comments are inflammatory, so why did they think it would be a good decision to put the school's rep in jeopardy? They had complete control over this situation.
Its not like yahoo did the interview, I would expect them not to care about LSU's rep... but our own newspaper? cmon!
Once they knew they had something controversial, They got excited.
Yes, No one cares about the Reveille, but here's where it becomes bad for LSU.
Look at this... FOXsports Yahoo B/R
Just to name a few... Obviously more news sources are preoccupied due to events in Boston.
There’s a reason a Sports Information Director from LSU told a Daily Reveille reporter his interview with senior quarterback Zach Mettenberger was finished when the word “gay” came up. The Athletic Department was likely worried a player may say something insensitive about the controversial subject.
I'm happy someone is there to protect them from predatory journalism... Thats what this is.
I in no way meant to belittle any person's way of life and feel that everyone deserves a chance to become whatever they want to be. One of my comments that was left out of Friday's article shows this.
to who ever targeted him and decided to publish his response...
Here's the audio. Written article is slanderous in nature when compared to the audio. LINK
Micah Bedard ?@DardDog 18h Can it be tomorrow already? Because @lsureveille is about to break some news NO BR sports reporters did. It's gonna be a good day. Collapse Reply
Ben Love ?@BenLoveTSD 1h @Rome_TDR Man, the amount of chest-puffing by Reveille last night and today is puzzling. What exactly did you accomplish? Where's the story?
Glad im not the only one calling them out.
This post was edited on 4/23 at 10:52 am