you can't judge EG as the worst contract ever after only one season. pure stupidity
Correct. But objectivity or patience apparently equals nut hugging on the board.
The only thing that doesn't exist on the internet is middle ground.
If oak was closer to 7 mil than 9 or 10 or whatever he made, it would have a been a solid contract. People under value what he did replacing Tyson. Such is sports.
I think Okafor's contract was viewed as being bad because of the timing. Posey and Peja were worse, but at least we had a decent team and players.
With Oak's contract we didn't have a good team and were kinda hamstringed from making moves. I think that was why it seems worse than it was.