Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes - Page 3 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
blueboy
LSU Fan
between here and there
Member since Apr 2006
17565 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


I might go tomorrow afternoon. Do you think it would be creepy for a 41 year-old man to go see this in the middle of the afternoon by himself?





Back to top
Blue Velvet
Colorado State Fan
Kenai, Alaska
Member since Nov 2009
15525 posts
 Online 

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


quote:

I might go tomorrow afternoon. Do you think it would be creepy for a 41 year-old man to go see this in the middle of the afternoon by himself?
Nope. Even if it is, it will not stop me. Weekday afternoons are the best theater times.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
JS87
New Orleans Saints Fan
St. Rose
Member since Aug 2010
5600 posts
 Online 

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


quote:

I might go tomorrow afternoon. Do you think it would be creepy for a 41 year-old man to go see this in the middle of the afternoon by himself?


I saw it today earlier at lunch, and I was the only dude along with 2 other women who were on the bottom row.

(As I anticipated at sometime they would) They left after the gun barrel blowjob scene and I was by myself






Back to top
Blue Velvet
Colorado State Fan
Kenai, Alaska
Member since Nov 2009
15525 posts
 Online 

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


blueboy,
See it yet? I just got back.






Back to top
Weebie
New Orleans Saints Fan
NOLA
Member since Dec 2012
3717 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


quote:

I just got back.


your thoughts?






Back to top
Blue Velvet
Colorado State Fan
Kenai, Alaska
Member since Nov 2009
15525 posts
 Online 

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


gratuitous





Back to top
  Replies (0)
blueboy
LSU Fan
between here and there
Member since Apr 2006
17565 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


quote:

See it yet? I just got back.

No. Sorry. I'm a shady looking character, and I refuse to see that in the middle of the afternoon by myself. Yes. It's a mental problem, but there you have it.

And I can't get anyone to go with me.

Just tell me. Is it worth the risk?






Back to top
Blue Velvet
Colorado State Fan
Kenai, Alaska
Member since Nov 2009
15525 posts
 Online 

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


Nah





Back to top
Javzz
Maryland Fan
Member since Jan 2006
1346 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


I thought the first half sucked. Selena Gomez character was useless, and she was basically the main part of the first half. She was miserable.

I enjoyed the second half. I felt the movie shifted to James Franco's character being the central theme, and his acting was fricking badass. It still felt like it tried too hard at times with the introspective montages, and the ending was out of fricking left field. Overall, I enjoyed it.







Back to top
  Replies (0)
MaesterMullen
Mississippi St. Fan
flowood,ms
Member since Jul 2012
1653 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


quote:

gun barrel blowjob scene









Back to top
  Replies (0)
blueboy
LSU Fan
between here and there
Member since Apr 2006
17565 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


quote:

Nah

So it re-assumes my original expectations. Thanks. I'll just google "Vanessa Hudgens nudes" and call it a day.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
ragacamps
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2011
2176 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


So do all of the girls get naked??? This will play a major role in me seeing this movie





Back to top
saintsfan22
New Orleans Saints Fan
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
26088 posts
 Online 

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


I think the one nobody cares about is the only one that shows anything.





Back to top
Tactical1
New Orleans Saints Fan
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
14886 posts
 Online 

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


quote:

Project x was awesome








Back to top
  Replies (0)
Blue Velvet
Colorado State Fan
Kenai, Alaska
Member since Nov 2009
15525 posts
 Online 

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


The director's wife





Back to top
blueboy
LSU Fan
between here and there
Member since Apr 2006
17565 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


quote:

The director's wife

Really?

Ethnocentricity and nepotism, children. This is why you fail.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
UnluckyTiger
Illinois Fan
Member since Sep 2003
20740 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


So...

this movie was AWESOME.

A couple of people walked out though. One of the craziest movies I've ever seen, but really cool and different.

James Franco


The music was awesome, really loved the opening 10 minutes or so, wild to mellow. It trails off a little and then picks up once Franco shows up again.

Spring Breakkkkk Spring Breakkkk Spring Breakk foreva



This post was edited on 4/7 at 10:36 pm


Back to top
Who Me
LSU Fan
Ascension
Member since Aug 2011
5569 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


It was like a train wreck that you can't look away from.


Very different.


One of the things I left thinking was how accurately it depicts how we got some dumb arse whores in this world.






Back to top
CE Tiger
New Orleans Saints Fan
Metairie
Member since Jan 2008
31029 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


this movie was frickin terrible.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Weebie
New Orleans Saints Fan
NOLA
Member since Dec 2012
3717 posts

re: Spring Breakers up to 70% on Rotten Tomatoes


quote:

It was like a train wreck that you can't look away from.


finally saw it last night and this pretty much sums it up. however James Franco was incredible. even as silly of character that he was playing (and ripping off Riff Raff some), he really did pull it off and did a damn good job. the female characters surprisingly weren't that bad either particularly Selena Gomez, but the main two girls were a bit annoying at times. the story was just ridiculous however.

overall I give the film 5 out of 10. not good, but not awful either. it had its moments, but had more WTF and downright silly moments that brought the movie down for me. James Franco's performance is what brought it back up and made the movie worth watching.

obviously an Oscar nomination will be a stretch, but he certainly deserves some nominations for his performance.



This post was edited on 7/2 at 10:02 pm


Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top