| Posted by | Message |
Powerman 
LSU Fan
Corpus Christi, TX
Member since Jan 2004
116210 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 6:56 am to mpwilging)
quote:
ALL the great running backs get stronger as the game goes on and their carries pile up. This is just a historical fact...
It's a fact that you're an idiot for believing this nonsense
The only thing that's a fact is that defenses get tired as the game goes on
|
| Back to top | |
coldhotwings
Temple Fan
Mississippi
Member since Jan 2008
5984 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:01 am to mpwilging)
quote:
If this is true, then we have a problem in conditioning. ALL the great running backs get stronger as the game goes on and their carries pile up. This is just a historical fact...
I hope you are not being serious.
|
| Back to top | |
MastrShake
LSU Fan
atlanta
Member since Nov 2008
1793 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:06 am to coldhotwings)
ill begin to get optimistic if we fire studrawa
|
| Back to top | |
coldhotwings
Temple Fan
Mississippi
Member since Jan 2008
5984 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:23 am to MastrShake)
quote:
ill begin to get optimistic if we fire studrawa
Well it looks like he is sticking around for the 2013 season so you could either mope around for another season or you could find some sort of silver lining and get behind the team. I find much more satisfaction doing the latter.
|
| Back to top | |
Penrod
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2011
2309 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:28 am to heartbreakTiger)
quote:
pretty sure the answer is 0 57 yard run for a td and we dont hear from him again. brilliant coaching
You guys are soooo stupid! Several reasons why Zhill got no touches.
1) Clemson made adjustments on defense that shut down the running game. Our coaches wisely decided to throw the ball.
2) Normal rotation to keep fresh legs in the game. Hill is definitely our best back, but the difference between Hill and Hilliard/Ware is very little, and is unlikely to materially affect the game.
3) The defense (worn out) allowed Clemson to keep the ball and eat up the clock. Our entire offense had limited plays.
Idiot fans don't want to admit this because they'd rather blame a coach and keep their vicarious dreams largely intact, but we lost to Clemson because our team was highly unmotivated and played with very sporadic effort.
|
| Back to top | |
Chimlim
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
10423 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 7:31 am to lsuallen)
It will be if we stop running up the middle against 9 in the box
|
| Back to top | |
Weaver 
Southeastern LA Fan
Mandeville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
19745 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 8:13 am to lsuallen)
I would agree almost as stacked as we were with Cecil Faulk and mealey
|
| Back to top | |
cheeser
LSU Fan
downtown fishville
Member since Feb 2007
563 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 9:01 am to Sho Nuff)
quote:
How fricking sad that we all know this? If Less let Hill run 20 times a game, the kid could be a Heisman contender. Not that I give a shite about that award, but Hill is a stud and could be unreal if unleashed. How many carries did Hill have in the 4th quarter against Clemson
it is coaching decisions exactly like the brilliant "running back by committee", and benching your best back for practically an entire half that will be the reason fournette will NOT come to lsu. he will be at hated fricking alabama getting 30 touches a game,and winning the heisman trophy.
|
| Back to top | |
cajunjj
LSU Fan
Madison, AL
Member since May 2008
5826 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 9:07 am to cheeser)
Pen Rod could also be called a nimrod!  
|
| Back to top | |
gotygers
LSU Fan
west St.Tammany
Member since Sep 2007
2924 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 9:19 am to cajunjj)
Pen rod we had we had 1 yard of O in the 4th quarter! Tulane would have done better! We need to fire Miles and hire an offensive type coach who will keep Chavis.
The winning has been strictly because of Chavis. Miles runs the O and it has been very bad for years!
|
| Back to top | |
damnstrongfan
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
543 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 9:23 am to lsuallen)
If we can't pass the ball, the running game will be irrelavent.
|
| Back to top | |
jtran1988
LSU Fan
Tampa, Fl
Member since Oct 2008
1963 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/20/13 at 11:49 am to damnstrongfan)
WE MIGHT EVEN SEE 11 IN THE BOX FOR THAT "LETHAL" RUNNING GAME.
|
| Back to top | |
Sho Nuff
LSU Fan
Hawaii
Member since Feb 2009
2059 posts
 Online
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:07 am to coldhotwings)
quote:
No. If you watched closely, you can see Hill was getting worn out late in the season. That tends to happen when teams constantly stack the box against our run game. Last season, Ware was effective for maybe the first 4 or 5 games before he got a flat tire. Then came Hilliard. Hilliard became the man this past season after Blue went down and then he became ineffective because of wear and tear. Until our passing game gets more respect, it is best to rotate the RB's to keep the starter near full strength for the entire season.
Sorry coldwings, that just isn't completely accurate. You make it sound like there are no RB's out there who can handle getting carries throughout a game when the D focuses in on them. That is conditioning if you're saying 3 of the LSU RB's can't handle the box being stacked.
I mean seriously dude, you're making excuses. I am ALL about mixing in great RB's like Blue and Hilliard, but Miles needs to let 1 guy be the man for multiple games in a row. If he gets too "tired" as you say, then he needs to work harder. And Hill could be a superstar.
|
| Back to top | |
Sho Nuff
LSU Fan
Hawaii
Member since Feb 2009
2059 posts
Online
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/21/13 at 3:14 am to Penrod)
quote:
1) Clemson made adjustments on defense that shut down the running game. Our coaches wisely decided to throw the ball.
And you call others stupid? The coach, not plural, decided to throw the ball and LSU lost because of it. Instead of burning the Clemsonquote:
2) Normal rotation to keep fresh legs in the game.
TO's, they laughed at the stupidity and drove the ball right down the tired D's throats.
Hill had 0, as in ZERO carries in the 4th quarter. His legs were as fresh as if they just started the game! Do you guys ever get tired of making excuses for the buffoon on the sidelines?
quote:
3) The defense (worn out) allowed Clemson to keep the ball and eat up the clock. Our entire offense had limited plays.
Now we're getting somewhere. WHY did/does the offense have limited plays? I do not blame the D. They were there for 100 plays. They finally broke. The pathetic offense which is determined by pathetic coaching let the Tigers down.
|
| Back to top | |
tigersnipen
LSU Fan
Member since Dec 2006
627 posts
Online
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/21/13 at 8:34 am to gotygers)
quote:
We need to fire Miles and hire an offensive type coach who will keep Chavis.
Please stop, we aren't firing miles anytime soon. Might as well accept that fact.
|
| Back to top | |
uway 
USA Fan
Member since Sep 2004
16198 posts
Online
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/21/13 at 8:46 am to lsuallen)
quote:
Message Posted by lsuallen This running attack next year could be the best ever!
That's fine, but the burning question remains: was the 2012 backfield the BEST OF ALL TIME???
|
| Back to top | |
navy 
Navy Fan
Bannedeville, LA
Member since Sep 2010
3424 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/21/13 at 9:03 am to Penrod)
quote:
Idiot fans don't want to admit this because they'd rather blame a coach and keep their vicarious dreams largely intact, but we lost to Clemson because our team was highly unmotivated and played with very sporadic effort.
And you wouldn't hold a coach or coaching staff accountable for any of your own assessment ? 
|
| Back to top | |
Will2nd
LSU Fan
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2009
902 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/21/13 at 9:11 am to johnrocker)
quote:
the best back NEVER gets all the touches in the 2nd half....FACT
If Blue and Hill stay healthy, I like who will be coming off the sidelines.
|
| Back to top | |
navy
Navy Fan
Bannedeville, LA
Member since Sep 2010
3424 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/21/13 at 9:14 am to lsuallen)
quote:
"next yrs...."
This makes me think I'm on a Notre Dame board.
|
| Back to top | |
cajunjj
LSU Fan
Madison, AL
Member since May 2008
5826 posts
| re: next yrs. running game could be lethal (Posted on 1/21/13 at 9:17 am to johnrocker)
Only if Les wakes up & notices that Hill is a beast & run him & Blue second. I want hold my breath!
|
| Back to top | |
