fricking a dog
that's a crime that a state would prosecute if they so chose
and that's not what he was charged with
eating shite is free speech
Well, the issue at hand is actually the filming of and distribution of those activities, not the actual acts.
Do tell, what is the message?
Didn't know speech needed a message to be protected.
The constitution says quite clearly, "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech."
Do you see any exceptions in that language?
This post was edited on 1/17 at 8:01 pm