Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
WikiTiger
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
40721 posts

Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison



Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison



First amendment:

quote:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


First amendment condensed to the part relevant to speech:

quote:

Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech





So....any one here care to justify this?

We have a lot of conservatives on this board that claim to love the constitution. Surely they'll be against this, right?







Back to top
Share:
mograyback
Missouri Fan
Member since Jul 2011
7102 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


This guy and Martha Stewart go to jail.. the people that caused financial collapse hide behind the masks of banks and corporations while getting bailed out, the opposite of going to jail.


This post was edited on 1/17 at 7:09 pm


Back to top
wickowick
LSU Fan
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
23767 posts
 Online 

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

A Los Angeles-based creator of pornographic fetish films was sentenced to four years in federal prison Wednesday for producing and selling obscene material.


I don't agree with this. If he violated any law with the bestiality, he should be tried for this...






Back to top
jcole4lsu
Virginia Fan
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
27041 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


Four years for golden shower vids? Wtf is that shit?!

Merica frick yeah






Back to top
  Replies (0)
SlowFlowPro
Stanford Fan
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
298169 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

Since 1999, he has operated a business with one goal in mind: make money off of individuals that enjoy sick materials

what's da big fuggin deal?






Back to top
Dire Wolf
LSU Fan
Sudden Valley
Member since Sep 2008
8716 posts
 Online 

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

quote: Since 1999, he has operated a business with one goal in mind: make money off of individuals that enjoy sick materials


The director of twilight should get 20 to life






Back to top
  Replies (0)
carbola
Michigan Fan
Middle East
Member since Aug 2010
3958 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


A) this is bullshite

B) what is the difference between prostuation and a porn?

C)
quote:

Some of his films, which depict bestiality and sexual situations involving human excrement, were shown to the jury during his third trial last April.


This was done just to gross out the jurors to make him spend time in jail

D) It looks like the only "crime" he really did was make fetish porn available for free. I don't see what the problem is. But then again Bush making pushing for Obscenity Laws (according to the article) just goes to show you how much "freedom" Republicans love to give you.

E)
quote:

According to federal law, material must meet a three-part test to be considered criminally obscene: It must appeal to a prurient interest, lack scientific, artistic and political value and be patently offensive.
WTF does this mean? If a group of jurors finds it gross that I like to suck on my own toe (thinking of something random) then I can go to jail for being obscene? That's BS


Lastly,

quote:

Addressing Isaacs directly, King said, "You are an abuser of the 1st Amendment. You cheapen the 1st Amendment."


Because we all know fetish porn only watched by a small percentage of people degrades the first amendment...



ETA: Sorry if parts of this seem off. I'm running a sever lack of sleep right now and can't really think to clear. Huzzah 8 more hours till I'm off shift



This post was edited on 1/17 at 7:25 pm


Back to top
tylercsbn9
LSU Fan
Tomball, TX
Member since Feb 2004
55079 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

what is the difference between prostuation and a porn?


I always laugh at this hypocrisy

it is bs he is going to jail






Back to top
  Replies (0)
wickowick
LSU Fan
Head of Island
Member since Dec 2006
23767 posts
 Online 

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison




your hand and herpes






Back to top
Turbeauxdog
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2004
5730 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


Hopefully the ACLU gets behind his appeal





Back to top
carbola
Michigan Fan
Middle East
Member since Aug 2010
3958 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

your hand and herpes





Or is is just me?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
WikiTiger
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
40721 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

Hopefully the ACLU gets behind his appeal


Probably wouldn't be successful. The Feds also got Max Hardcore on this shite.



Apparently a long time ago, some lawyers wearing robes got together and ruled that the words "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech" actually means "Congress shall make some law(s) ... abridging the freedom of speech"






Back to top
USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


No way he should be incarcerated, but I'm pretty sure beastality isn't legal in CA.





Back to top
WikiTiger
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
40721 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

but I'm pretty sure beastality isn't legal in CA.


They didn't charge him with that, and that would be a state issue, not federal.






Back to top
USMC Gators
Member since Oct 2011
14633 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


Well in that case, he should've never been on trial then.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Turbeauxdog
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2004
5730 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

Apparently a long time ago, some lawyers wearing robes got together and ruled that the words "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech" actually means "Congress shall make some law(s) ... abridging the freedom of speech"


Yeah, that seems to be their schtick






Back to top
  Replies (0)
CarrolltonTiger
LSU Fan
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2005
46304 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

what is the difference between prostuation and a porn?


the sheep and the pigs can't consent?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
deltaland
Mississippi St. Fan
Member since Mar 2011
24168 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


I'm a strong conservative and I have a problem with them prosecuting him. Maybe put him on trial for illegal bestiality but the rest of it is perfectly legal if the women/men involved consented to it, no matter how disgusting.

And nobody is going to watch that shite (no pun intended) unless they actually want to so it isn't offending anyone. You have to actually search for that kind of gross material, not like it pops up in front of everyone faces on the internet.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
lordguill
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Dec 2005
20558 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

B) what is the difference between prostuation and a porn?



Nothing. It's hypocrisy at its finest.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
deltaland
Mississippi St. Fan
Member since Mar 2011
24168 posts

re: Producer of pornographic fetish films gets 4 years in prison


quote:

Apparently a long time ago, some lawyers wearing robes got together and ruled that the words "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech" actually means "Congress shall make some law(s) ... abridging the freedom of speech"


Well obviously the founding fathers couldn't have predicted the invention of the internet, DVDs, and porn. We should let him do his fetish material in newspapers/magazine form only because that is all that existed in their time.












Am I doing this right?






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top