Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? - Page 3 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
347 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Restomed "U are A Pussy" suck my and follow another team u little





Back to top
ninthward
LSU Fan
Verdi,NV
Member since May 2007
5689 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


op did you watch Kevin when he played?
because the energy is not the same,






Back to top
Restomod
Highland Park, Tx
Member since Mar 2012
2606 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

Restomed "U are A Pussy" suck my and follow another team u little 






This post was edited on 1/13 at 9:57 am


Back to top
bigeztiger
USA Fan
Columbus Ohio
Member since Jul 2011
4868 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

Same thing was posted about hillard last season






Back to top
Srbtiger06
USA Fan
Buga Nation
Member since Apr 2006
20577 posts
 Online 

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Hill had a great second half of his first season. He's no Faulk though. He isn't even Addai.


ETA: Not saying he can't be, but he's not really close yet. He's a great runner, but Addai and especially Faulk had more to their game.



This post was edited on 1/12 at 11:47 pm


Back to top
Srbtiger06
USA Fan
Buga Nation
Member since Apr 2006
20577 posts
 Online 

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

op did you watch Kevin when he played?
because the energy is not the same,



To be fair, has anyone ever come close to having the same fire as Faulk? He was in a class all of his own.






Back to top
ATLTiger
#TreyBiletnikoffs
Member since Sep 2003
34754 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


I think the well-roundedness of Hill's game is underrated. the coaches were bringing him in for pass protection situations before they really started featuring him as a runner, and he can catch.

he's an intriguing talent to say the least.






Back to top
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
347 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


u guys have no vision and have never seen talent and prob a nega tiger because the best is in the past.

U motherfrickers that cant get over loses and move on to the fact we are a Top 5 program and will be until recruits read ur frickin craziness need to SMD!






Back to top
Srbtiger06
USA Fan
Buga Nation
Member since Apr 2006
20577 posts
 Online 

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

I think the well-roundedness of Hill's game is underrated. the coaches were bringing him in for pass protection situations before they really started featuring him as a runner, and he can catch.

he's an intriguing talent to say the least.



Agreed. I think he has potential, he just hasn't shown the explosiveness in those other areas like the aforementioned did. The potential is there though. I just think comparing him to guys like addai and Faulk is a tad premature.






Back to top
Srbtiger06
USA Fan
Buga Nation
Member since Apr 2006
20577 posts
 Online 

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:


u guys have no vision and have never seen talent and prob a nega tiger because the best is in the past.

U motherfrickers that cant get over loses and move on to the fact we are a Top 5 program and will be until recruits read ur frickin craziness need to SMD!



English?






Back to top
HHSTigerAlumni
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2010
224 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


same talk was said about Ware when he was trucking over people two years ago to never get those caries again, then it was said about Hilliard last year, and look at his season this year, Now Hill has an excellent 2nd half season is its being said about him now....Fact is LSU always has stud rbs who could be anyones starter and premiere back in NCAA. Thats a lock!





Back to top
TyOconner
Troy Fan
NOLA
Member since Nov 2009
10095 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Hill is good but shit, he has to produce a LOT more to be up there with Faulk.





Back to top
dukke v
UCLA Fan
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
122932 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

I think the well-roundedness of Hill's game is underrated. the coaches were bringing him in for pass protection situations before they really started featuring him as a runner, and he can catch.




This is spot on. I know the dude and he TOLD me in a job interview that he would end up being the best back out of what LSU has . The dude is a beast and IF Miles handles him right he could set records that may NEVER be broken at LSU. YES. The dude is THAT GOOD.BUt as of NOW??? He is nowhere near as good as faulk or Dalton Hiliard[the BEST EVER]IMO.






Back to top
Jrv2damac
LSU Fan
Birmingham
Member since Mar 2004
22144 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

you guys are fukin nerds bro I dont believe speaking highly of someone jinks them



Expectations and acclamations this high just lead to disappointment and attacking the kid when he isn't up to that bar. Look at Mett.






Back to top
TopsInAmericaTim
LSU Fan
Houston Area
Member since Oct 2011
200 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


I think you're right. He sees the hole better than Addai, Ridley, and the others. He seems to have a better acceleration in the open field as well. He's jumped ahead, as a true freshman, of probably 4 NFL caliber backs. There's a reason why he was breaking big runs and the next back would always get a few yards. Great observation.





Back to top
Penrod
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2011
3667 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

He's the best since a freshman Justin Vincent. Please don't jinx him.


Justin Vincent wasn't in Hill's class. This guy has everything Vincent has plus speed and more power. If it was Hill who got that first carry against Oklahoma he would have scored. Vincent got run down easily. No comparison.

And, yes, Hill is our best back, but I'll go back to Dalton Hilliard. We've never had a back as good as Hilliard at picking up "running back yards", and we still don't. Hill's great speed, though, turns some of those 10 yard carries into TDs. I like Faulk, but I'm calling him third.

If you consider Kevin, Chris, and Marshall Faulk, and Dalton and Kenny Hilliard plus Jeremy Hill, I say if a recruit's name is Faulk or starts with Hill, sign him up!






Back to top
Loftonbranch
Member since Jan 2012
71 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Leonard cometh





Back to top
djrunner
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2010
1158 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Something was said about ware after AtM bowl gamw





Back to top
msutiger
Louisiana Tech Fan
Ruston
Member since Jul 2008
48671 posts
 Online 

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Dude he hasn't even carried the load for a full season. Give it a rest.





Back to top
TxTiger82
LSU Fan
Madison, WI
Member since Sep 2004
22574 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Hill has as much potential as any RB to play at LSU. Ever.





Back to top


Back to top




//