Sign In  |  Register  
June 17, 2013 
LSU Football

Posted byMessage
peopleschamp
Xavier Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
5568 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


We all have our favorites, but I liked Dominic Davis. In college I liked the way he played and ran.





Back to top
biglego
LSU Fan
your mom knows
Member since Nov 2007
13202 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

Cecil is the best I've ever seen.

+1
Although we didn't get to see much of him.

Healthy Alley Broussard was pretty awesome too.






Back to top
Murray
Elon Fan
Member since Aug 2008
5800 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

used properly will keep our defense off the field








Back to top
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
268 posts
 Online 

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


again i like a "all down back" catches, runs, blocks he can and will do it all. those other guys mentioned did not do it all name one who did it all..

Dont give me a 1200 yard rusher unless he has 500 receiving or some shite.







Back to top
tucotiger
Member since Dec 2012
309 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Any of you people forget how Alfred Blue was running before he got hurt?? Dude was running like a 1st round draft choice, best on the team at the time of injury!





Back to top
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
268 posts
 Online 

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Dude I like Blue and he is from my high school but can anyone please tell me they dont see a different kinda back in Hill. For the love of God





Back to top
dgnx6
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
16513 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Not really, the dude hasnt played much. Rbs at lsu are often injured and do so through out their career. Id like to see him from game 1 and see how he holds up the whole season.





Back to top
tucotiger
Member since Dec 2012
309 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Look dude don't go overboard, I'm just pointing out AB was running at a high level before the injury. Dude was nite and day from the back I saw last season, and I'm just pointing that out. Hill is a special back, no doubt at all. He has it all, size, speed, power or elusiveness. I just hope Mile's doesn't ruin him!


This post was edited on 1/12 at 9:51 pm


Back to top
thanksjhester
LSU Fan
Member since Jun 2009
3957 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


No not even close and two different styles.





Back to top
AlaTiger
LSU Fan
Alabama
Member since Aug 2006
10038 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Stevan Ridley was really good. He ran for over 1,100 yards on a team with no passing game and against 8-9 men in the box every play. He didn't get the credit he deserved from our fanbase because he was a 3 star recruit.

FACT.

Sometimes, LSU fans are just stupid.






Back to top
LSUsCRYSTALball
LSU Fan
Member since Dec 2012
1697 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

"Potentially"


?? uhhh






Back to top
Restomod
Member since Mar 2012
1041 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


You just jinxed him...bravo





Back to top
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
268 posts
 Online 

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Restomod fuk off tired of fukin negative mother frickers like you, leave the board if u dont like LSU or have any way of being positive u pussy..





Back to top
Tiger1242
LSU Fan
Member since Jul 2011
13844 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

He's the best since a freshman Justin Vincent.

GOD frickING DAMNIT, WAY TO GO YOU JINXING MOTHER frickER






Back to top
Tiger Nation 84
LSU Fan
Lake Chuck
Member since Dec 2011
6683 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


No doubt Ridley was a damn stud and still is, Patriots couldn't hold him down 2 years in a row, he's just too great of a weapon to keep on the sidelines.





Back to top
siliconvalleytiger
LSU Fan
Northern California
Member since Apr 2004
19998 posts
 Online 

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


Addai was great too





Back to top
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
268 posts
 Online 

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


but im sayin brah, Hill with a catch out off the backfield and in open space will be special situation.

Championships!!






Back to top
Lester Earl
New Orleans Saints Fan
Flavortown
Member since Nov 2003
162379 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


alley broussard was better than all of them...damn, dude was sick





Back to top
Tiger Nation 84
LSU Fan
Lake Chuck
Member since Dec 2011
6683 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


I'm not disagreeing about Hill man, he has the potential to be a special player, he just has to keep his head on the right way and work hard to be better on the field and a leader in the locker room. If he can do all of this he can have a very successful career at LSU. We just hope he stays on the right track and brings us to another NCG or runs for a Heisman!
ETA: We all know what happened to TM7, we just hope that doesn't happen again.



This post was edited on 1/12 at 11:10 pm


Back to top
Restomod
Member since Mar 2012
1041 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?


quote:

Restomod fuk off tired of fukin negative mother frickers like you, leave the board if u dont like LSU or have any way of being positive u pussy..




You are a jinx...






Back to top



Topics of Interest

Back to top