Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk? | TigerDroppings.com
Posted by
Message
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
446 posts

Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?

Lots of threads on Hill I know but really looking for quick yes or no answers.

I know he is young but his skill set is almost pro level already with his size speed agility and the shear fact stubborn arse miles has played a first year player over other experienced good running backs says a lot. I mean I just see something different about this guy and and we have definitely some great backs since 98..

This post was edited on 1/12 at 9:24 pm



jacks40
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2007
11596 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Cecil?


The Boat
Duke Fan
Member since Oct 2008
67400 posts
Online

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Great. This thread pretty much just fricked him for next season.


JJ27
TCU Fan
Member since Sep 2004
48992 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
He's the best since a freshman Justin Vincent. Please don't jinx him.


AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
446 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
someone that actually played more than 1 year


AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
446 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
you guys are fukin nerds bro I dont believe speaking highly of someone jinks them


StealthCalais11
LSU Fan
10236 Charing Cross Road, LA, CA
Member since Aug 2011
4673 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
I think you're forgetting a certain 1,200+ yard rusher for the Patriots...


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
LSUTil_iDie
LA-Monroe Fan
Lawrenceville, GA
Member since Jan 2012
4585 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Let's see him play a FULL season before we start comparing him.


Stevo
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
5846 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
He's already better than Addai?


AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
446 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
I'm not forgetting Ridley but lets get real this dude is 6'2 235 and a GD monster with speed


darryljames30
New Orleans Pelicans Fan
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
14880 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Addai and Ridley were damn good.


BACONisMEATcandy
LSU Fan
Delta, Amex, & Über Threads
Member since Dec 2007
42832 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Same thing was posted about hillard last season


Topwater Trout
LSU Fan
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
41037 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
No


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
446 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
What im sayin is his potential is what a special "one of a kind" horse that u can get u too a Championship looks like he has it all I believe..


AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
446 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Dude Hilliard is good but not even close to the same skill set I'm talkin about. Come On man


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
easy money
LSU Fan
Member since Feb 2005
6194 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Hold up.....we haven't seen a rb even hold down the whole season as a starter in a few years. Hill is good, but to be critical, he has not shown a great ability to run in between the tackles and sustain drives. He hits a 50 yd td every game it seems, but we need him to get stronger and trust his blocking so he can pick up those 4 and 5 yard runs that keep drives alive.


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
Clark W Griswold
LSU Fan
Walley World
Member since Sep 2012
2870 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Cecil is the best I've ever seen. Davis and Toefield were pretty good too. I'd even put Hester up there. Hill hasnt done enough to be considered that special yet.


ApexTiger
LSU Fan
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
31512 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Yes, quick reaction is, Hill is special, like a RB we haven't had in a while and we have had several good ones


Replies (0)
Replies (0)
AustinKnight
LSU Fan
Austin, TX
Member since May 2012
446 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Ill put potentially in my thread i agree he isnt yet but just very excited about what Ive seen and a back like this used properly will keep our defense off the field and actually sustain a MF drive is what can get us back into the SEC championship game next damn year ya heard me.


heehaw
LSU Fan
Member since May 2009
4584 posts

re: Would you agree Hill is "Potentially" the best back since Faulk?
Vincent in 2003
Addai in 2005
Ridley in 2010
Charles Scott in 2008

All just as good as Hill at this point.


Page 1 of 4

Back to top

Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram