clear and transparent election for President | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
BCSmess
LSU Fan
earth
Member since Jan 2013
440 posts

clear and transparent election for President


As each state reported their final election details, the evidence of voter fraud is astounding. Massive voter fraud has been reported in areas of OH and FL, with PA, WI and VA, all are deploying personnel to investigate election results.

Here are just a few examples of what has surfaced with much more to come.
* In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama
received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for
Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).
* In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of
the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their
polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney.
(Another statistical impossibility).
* In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only
98,213 eligible voters.
* In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered
eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.
* The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie
County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.
* Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout.
* In Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of
eligible voters.
NOTE: Obama won in every state that did not require a Photo ID and lost in every state that did require a Photo ID in order to vote.
Imagine that!







Back to top
Share:
mmcgrath
LSU Fan
New Jersey
Member since Feb 2010
4092 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


Some interesting tidbits, yet not a single piece of evidence that voter fraud was committed.







Back to top
EthanL
LSU Fan
Auburn,AL
Member since Oct 2011
2991 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


quote:

Some interesting tidbits, yet not a single piece of evidence that voter fraud was committed.


This






Back to top
UnevenElephant3
LA-Monroe Fan
Balmora
Member since Jan 2010
2080 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


I do not understand how if this is a fact how an investigation has not started...? This has to be bull shite somone made up because this is far to fraudulent to not launch an investigation since it is now public knowledge.





Back to top
Bestbank Tiger
Tulane Fan
Landmass
Member since Jan 2005
19216 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


quote:

Some interesting tidbits, yet not a single piece of evidence that voter fraud was committed.


I'm skeptical of those facts, but if they were true it would be clear and convincing proof of fraud.






Back to top
carbola
Michigan Fan
Middle East
Member since Aug 2010
3737 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


quote:

(A mathematical and statistical impossibility)


How so?






Back to top
davesdawgs
Georgia Fan
Georgia
Member since Oct 2008
16510 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


quote:

Some interesting tidbits, yet not a single piece of evidence that voter fraud was committed.



Interesting tidbits? That's got to be the understatement of the year. While technically true, statistically there is strong evidence that either fraud and/or voting system incompetence exists. The fact that Obama won in every state that does not require voter identification is telling.






Back to top
real
LSU Fan
Dixieland
Member since Oct 2007
12628 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


I don't believe a voter fraud at that level happen,hell The democrats running those polling places wouldn't be smart enough to get away with something like that.


This post was edited on 1/12 at 11:12 am


Back to top
HNTIGER1980
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2011
439 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


YOU LOST!
Get over it.







Back to top
davesdawgs
Georgia Fan
Georgia
Member since Oct 2008
16510 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


quote:

I don't believe a voter fraud at that level happen,hell The democrats running those polling places wouldn't be smart enough to get away with something like that.


Apparently there is so little transparency in the locations cited that it take little or no smarts to pull it off.






Back to top
TideSatchel
Alabama Fan
Member since Nov 2011
2581 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


quote:

* In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for
It is true that 59 voting divisions in Philadelphia recorded no votes for Mitt Romney, but given the voter composition of the Philadelphia area (and some Philadelphia wards in particular) and the number of voters in each division, that outcome was hardly a "mathematical and statistical impossibility."

Barack Obama won the overall vote in the Philadelphia area by an 85% to 14% margin over Mitt Romney; Obama also received greater than 90% of the vote in more than half of Philadelphia's 66 wards, and 99% or more of the vote in seven of those wards. That result was hardly surprising given that, as the Philadelphia Inquirer noted, those wards are "clustered in almost exclusively black sections of West and North Philadelphia" and "nationally, 93 percent of African Americans voted for Obama." The Philadelphia wards that trended very heavily for Barack Obama included many divisions of between 200 and 500 voters in which Mitt Romney received a scant handful of votes (and sometimes no votes at all), a result mirroring that of the previous election, in which Republican candidate John McCain "got zero votes in 57 Philadelphia voting divisions." The results in Philadelphia were reflective not of an "impossible" statistical anomaly but rather of a general historical trend widely seen throughout the city. LINK
quote:

* In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney.
(Another statistical impossibility).
completely false. A precinct-by-precinct breakdown of the official voting results from Wood County, Ohio, for the 2012 election shows that Barack Obama received nowhere close to 100% of the votes cast in any of that county's 97 precincts. The highest percentage he achieved in any one precinct was 75.5. LINK
quote:

In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only 98,213 eligible voters.

The official Voter Turnout statistics for Ohio show Wood County recorded a total turnout of 64,342 voters, an amount far smaller than the number of registered voters in that county (108,014). LINK
quote:

In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.

This statement demonstrates a misunderstanding between the difference in "number of votes" cast and "number of cards" cast. The official election results from St. Lucie County, Florida, show, a total of 123,301 votes were cast for the office of President of the United States, but a total of 247,383 cards were cast because St. Lucie County used a two-page ballot (i.e., a ballot consisting of two cards), so every voter who returned both pages of his ballot cast two cards. LINK

As the web site of that county's elections board explains: "Turnout percentages will show over 100% due to a two page ballot. The tabulation system (GEMS) provides voter turnout as equal to the total cards cast in the election divided by the number of registered voters. Also note that some voters chose not to return by mail the second card." LINK

quote:

The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.

This entry repeats the same error as the previous one. The National SEAL Museum polling location in St. Lucie County had a turnout of 2756 registered voters, but a total of 4469 cards were cast because each voter's ballot consisted of two cards. The official vote count from that location for the office of President of the United States recorded 1,473 votes for Mitt Romney and 754 votes for Barack Obama.

quote:

Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout.

The official results for the 2012 general election for Palm Beach County, Florida, show that 605,268 out of 870,182 registered voters cast ballots for the office of President of the United States, a voter turnout rate of 69.56%, not 141%. LINK

quote:

In Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of eligible voters.

This statement is ambiguous because multiple states (Kentucky, Indiana, and West Virginia) have counties named Ohio. Nonetheless, this statement is false regardless of which of those counties is considered:

Mitt Romney won Ohio County, Kentucky, by a 67% to 31% margin. LINK
Mitt Romney won Ohio County, Indiana, by a 63% to 35% margin. LINK
Mitt Romney won Ohio County, West Virginia, by a 60% to 38% margin. LINK

quote:

Obama won in every state that did not require a Photo ID and lost in every state that did require a Photo ID in order to vote.

In the 2012 presidential election, Barack Obama did lose in every state that required all voters to provide photo ID, but those states were only four in number: Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, and Tennessee. Meanwhile, contrary to what is claimed here, he also lost in many states that did not require all voters to provide photo ID: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. LINK

We already have clear and transparent elections. (though not as transparent as they should be from a campaign finance standpoint imo.) maybe next time one of your friends sends you one of these bull shite emails, remind yourself that you're all tinfoil hat wearing morons who have no clue what's going on before you commit it to memory and come to post it here.






Back to top
Toddy
Ole Miss Fan
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
20460 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


This is old and has already been explained and refuted. I can't remember the details but if I cared enough to find the article explaining all of this you would look like an idiot.





Back to top
EthanL
LSU Fan
Auburn,AL
Member since Oct 2011
2991 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


quote:

I do not understand how if this is a fact how an investigation has not started...? This has to be bull shite somone made up because this is far to fraudulent to not launch an investigation since it is now public knowledge.


You are halfway right about made-up BS. As usual stuff is left out like same-day registration, absentee ballots, early voting etc






Back to top
EthanL
LSU Fan
Auburn,AL
Member since Oct 2011
2991 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


quote:

This is old and has already been explained and refuted. I can't remember the details but if I cared enough to find the article explaining all of this you would look like an idiot.


And this






Back to top
Toddy
Ole Miss Fan
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
20460 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


quote:

TideSatchel









Back to top
LSUMJ
LSU Fan
BR
Member since Sep 2004
14563 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


"
quote:

if I cared enough to find the article explaining all of this you would look like an idiot.


well turnabouts fair play for once i guess






Back to top
Kcrad
LSU Fan
Slidell
Member since Nov 2010
14100 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


No doubt fraud took place. Unfortunately, nothing will come of it.

Just buck up and vote in the mid-terms.






Back to top
tiger1014
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2011
10316 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


What chain email did this come from?





Back to top
Rex
LSU Fan
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
54398 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


quote:

Here are just a few examples of what has surfaced with much more to come.
* In 59 voting districts in the Philadelphia region, Obama
received 100% of the votes with not even a single vote recorded for
Romney. (A mathematical and statistical impossibility).


The Secretary of State in Pennsylvania is a Republican... you know.. Mitt Romney's party. She's not investigating. Why do you think that is?

quote:

* In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of
the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their
polling locations - and not one single vote was recorded for Romney.
(Another statistical impossibility).
* In Wood County Ohio, 106,258 voted in a county with only
98,213 eligible voters.


The Secretary of State in Ohio is a Republican... you know.. Mitt Romney's party. He's not investigating. Why do you think that is?

quote:

* In St. Lucie County, FL, there were 175,574 registered
eligible voters but 247,713 votes were cast.
* The National SEAL Museum, a polling location in St. Lucie
County, FL had a 158% voter turnout.
* Palm Beach County, FL had a 141% voter turnout.
* In Ohio County, Obama won by 108% of the total number of
eligible voters.


The Secretary of State in Florida is a Republican... you know.. Mitt Romney's party. He's not investigating. Why do you think that is?






Back to top
TOPAL
LSU Fan
Member since Mar 2010
764 posts

re: clear and transparent election for President


Because the fix was in; Obama was going to win regardless. Dems won country fricked. remember these times when we look back at the demise of our country. The great American dream is vanishing. We won, country lost. FO





Back to top


Back to top




//