because you are completely full of shite.
This coming from the guy that argues LSU lost 1 game in 2006, and that interceptions aren't negative plays.
If you really think that JaMarcus Brooks was great you should go look him up. He is hanging out on the street corner in Mobile stoned out of his mind waiting for statistic loving jock sniffers like you to come tell him how great he was
What does any of that have to do with the fact that he was better than Flynn at LSU?
Quit pulling shite out of your arse about stupid bull shite like Sanchez and Tebow.
Me showing you how stupid your argument is =/= me pulling bull shite out of my ass.
The debate is Flynn/Brooks. Stay focused.
I'm plenty focused.
Nick Saban named Russell his starter over Flynn.
Les Miles named Russell his starter over Flynn.
Russell won 1 quarterback of the year award and was a semi-finalist for another. Flynn got 0 consideration for either.
Russell was 1st team All SEC. Flynn MIGHT have been honorable mention.
Is that focused enough for you?
Flynn is a smart kid
And Russell isn't?
he was tough
Flynn missed 2 games and came out of another early in his 1 season. Russell missed 0.
stayed at LSU despite being better for the team that JaMarcus Brooks.
Both Saban and Miles disagree.
He was a straight arrow. Meaning he wasn't a jerkoff goofball jokester like JaMarcus Brooks that was up to no good
What trouble did Russell get in at LSU?
He was focused on LSU football and not his future pro career
Because Russell played like shite in his last few games at LSU, right?
Time will prove me right about Flynn's pro career. Trust me
You argue that interceptions aren't negative plays. Why should anyone trust you?
Jake Delhomme started for a long time in the NFL, so did your buddy Dilfer. Flynn will have his day and he will start more that 25 pathetic games.
What does that have to do with Matt Flynn?
Bro, you don't know shite about football. This is a waste of time with you. I don't think I'm right. I know I am.
Your argument is that rings are all that matters. In order for you to be right, you must also argue that AJ Mcarron > Andrew luck and Trent Dilfer > Dan Marino. But you've already called those ridiculous conclusions. So which is it?
I was cool with the debate until you got cocky.
Puffing your chest out doesn't change the fact that you are wrong.