#1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO | Page 2 | TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Hoodoo Man
LSU Fan
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
19454 posts
 Online 

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


I wouldn't call TM7 a guy with bad character.
The dude absolutely was a firecracker in the lockerroom.


The weed thing just needs to be dealt with.






Back to top
Suntiger
USA Fan
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
21170 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


TM7 needs to get out of Louisiana. He obviously has bad influences here and needs to go somewhere like Buffalo or Kansas City or New England where he can't get in trouble.

He can be successful in the right environment. It kind of reminds me of Jamarcus. As soon as Oakland signed him, I knew he had no chance. Same for TM7. A team like Oakland or Carolina will just get him in trouble.






Back to top
BarbeTiger
New Orleans Saints Fan
Mr. White's Lab Yo
Member since Jan 2012
5743 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


He could be good in Arizona with Peterson





Back to top
  Replies (0)
GratefulRebFallTour
Kentucky Fan
Shakedown Street
Member since Dec 2010
798 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


quote:

honey badger


Yes, the ultimate team player






Back to top
  Replies (0)
ffhouston
LSU Fan
The Woodlands
Member since Sep 2007
1913 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


quote:

I don't want to piss anyone off but could we get anything out of a Ingram trade .


Sure, just offer him up to Saban once he takes a new gig in 10 days or so. Former players help with installing "the process".






Back to top
  Replies (0)
dlesage23
LSU Fan
Member since Feb 2011
208 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


I would really like us select Matt Elam of FLA. every time I watch Florida play the kid is all over the field. Can cover, intercept, and tackle with authority. Really is a playmaker and has what it takes to pump up the D.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
blueslover
New Orleans Saints Fan
soon to be south of zero
Member since Sep 2007
20900 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


kinda on this playmaker train idea. The beauty of football to me is that it is one of the best "team" sports. That is, the coordination and performance of each player contributes to the outcome. Not like beisbol where you can plug 'n play any old slugger into a cleanup spot. In roundball get just a couple of dominant athletes and you can win big.

That said, it is painfully evident that the missing piece here is pass rush. All the DBs get some degree of flak but it's hard to judge the youngsters when asked to do so much so soon. Imagine Corey White covering players from Elon and Furman one year. The next he is forced into starting across from Roddy White or Jordy Nelson. Pass rush will make them all look better. Better coverage will create more situational pressure for rushers but not nearly as much as the other way around. Any DB, even elite, can only be asked to cover for so many seconds.






Back to top
Sho Nuff
New Orleans Saints Fan
Hawaii
Member since Feb 2009
4982 posts
 Online 

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


If we're keeping Spags and you want a play maker, I say they should go for Margus Hunt. JPP type of freak athlete. Of course, there are some other good DE's out there as well, but this guy Hunt could be a pure beast.

As far as TM, if he was available in the 6th round or later (which he won't) then sure go for a guy that will mainly play on ST's and could be put in some nickle packages. He's not a great cover but he is a ball hawk and is explosive.

But NOLA is the WORST place possible for that kid.






Back to top
motorbreath
New Orleans Saints Fan
Atlanta Braves Fan
Member since Jun 2004
4626 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


Don't understand why people keep saying Nola is the worst place for him. He has a support structure down here. If he goes anywhere else he will have the same problems but will be left to deal with it all by himself.





Back to top
Brettesaurus Rex
New Orleans Saints Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
23829 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


quote:

That said, it is painfully evident that the missing piece here is pass rush. All the DBs get some degree of flak but it's hard to judge the youngsters when asked to do so much so soon

Thank you. I'm def not opposed to taking a S or CB this draft, hell I hope we take both, but if we take anything but the best pass rusher on the board with our first pick I'll be very highly disappointed



This post was edited on 1/1 at 9:57 am


Back to top
blueslover
New Orleans Saints Fan
soon to be south of zero
Member since Sep 2007
20900 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


quote:

if we take anything but the best pass rusher on the board with our first pick I'll be very highly disappointed

You might get prepared then.

No Bushrod re-signed or UFA signed and LT elevates as an even greater need

I can envision Mingo, Montgomergy, & Ansah on the board and another position player grading higher BPA to take.

Hoping like you but could see it

Even better...

let's get the pass rusher before the draft. Older types like Freeney or Osi could be stopgap or my favorite would be Michael Johnson if they can afford him.

Then you're really free for BPA.






Back to top
Servedinafghanistan
New Orleans Saints Fan
Shalimar, Fl
Member since Feb 2005
6582 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


quote:

How long until he has to serve a 4 game suspension?


Pre-Season Game 2






Back to top
  Replies (0)
STEVED00
North Carolina St. Fan
Metairie, LA
Member since May 2007
11179 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


Our starting safeties (Harper/Jenkins) rarely get INTs and that is a HUGE problem IMO. Jenkins at FS is terrible at creating TOs.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
St Augustine
New Orleans Saints Fan
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
42430 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


quote:

Unload Will Smith, Roman Harpers salary on other teams for draft picks.


dude teams wouldn't take these salaries for free let alone GIVE us anything.

please stick to madden






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Brettesaurus Rex
New Orleans Saints Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
23829 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


I just feel like this draft sets up very well for us to get one of those top flight guys that could be playmakers for a long time for us.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
STEVED00
North Carolina St. Fan
Metairie, LA
Member since May 2007
11179 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


Our starting safeties (Harper/Jenkins) rarely get INTs and that is a HUGE problem IMO. Jenkins at FS is terrible at creating TOs.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
wildtigercat93
LSU Fan
Hammond, LA
Member since Jul 2011
44079 posts
 Online 

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


quote:

Call me crazy but I kind of want high character guys


TM7 may be a high character guy alright






Back to top
  Replies (0)
SJS Eagle 85
New Orleans Saints Fan
P-Town
Member since Apr 2009
5007 posts

re: #1 need on Defense isn't one specific position but a playmaker IMO


quote:

Don't understand why people keep saying Nola is the worst place for him. He has a support structure down here
He had a support structure at LSU too. Still didn't work for the young man. Also consider that only two of his positive tests were made public. No telling how many he failed that we didn't hear about. He reminds me way too much of Ricky Williams.






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top