| Posted by | Message |
Wooly 
USA Fan
Member since Feb 2012
11105 posts
| anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 6:44 pm)
I cant put my finger on it exactly but I had such high expectations going into it, when I left I felt let down.
Not his best work, but its no death proof either.
Im not sure what it was but the acting seemed off to me for some reason. First time we see sam jackson he is stuttering amd stuff then in the library he is spoken like a rhodes scholar.
I thought sam l Jackson was the best part of the movie.
Overall B-
Still better than 99% of the shite Hollywood puts out now adays, so definitely worth your money
|
| Back to top | Share on  |
Macintosh504 
Lamar Fan
Space
Member since Sep 2011
14901 posts
 Online
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 6:46 pm to Wooly)
quote:
I had such high expectations going into it
probably the reason why
|
| Back to top | |
Wooly
USA Fan
Member since Feb 2012
11105 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 6:49 pm to Macintosh504)
Yep... It must suck to be a director whos fans expect the best movie they have ever seen everytime you release a film
|
| Back to top | |
Tiger1242 
LSU Fan
Member since Jul 2011
13352 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 6:57 pm to Wooly)
No
|
| Back to top | |
jsquardjj
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2009
352 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:00 pm to Wooly)
quote:
Im not sure what it was but the acting seemed off to me for some reason. First time we see sam jackson he is stuttering amd stuff then in the library he is spoken like a rhodes scholar.
I believe this was done on purpose. He is supposed to just be the head house slave, but in all reality he is the brains behind Candyland.
|
| Back to top | |
cas4t
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2010
11521 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:11 pm to jsquardjj)
quote:
I believe this was done on purpose. He is supposed to just be the head house slave, but in all reality he is the brains behind Candyland
Spot on
|
| Back to top | |
OMLandshark 
Ole Miss Fan
Member since Apr 2009
26375 posts
Online
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:18 pm to Wooly)
quote:
Im not sure what it was but the acting seemed off to me for some reason. First time we see sam jackson he is stuttering amd stuff then in the library he is spoken like a rhodes scholar.
Honestly, he, not Candy, is the main antagonist of the film. If it weren't for him, there would be little antagonism between Candy, Django, and Waltz.
|
| Back to top | |
Patrick_Bateman
USA Fan
Member since Jan 2012
5099 posts
Online
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:28 pm to Wooly)
I thought it was good, not great. 7.5/10. Will watch again.
|
| Back to top | |
TFTC
LSU Fan
New Orleans, LA
Member since May 2010
7469 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:35 pm to Patrick_Bateman)
I thoroughly enjoyed it... thought it was fun..
|
| Back to top | |
shuke33 
Penn State Fan
Under The Bridge
Member since Nov 2010
8787 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:39 pm to TFTC)
I thought Goggins should of had a bigger role.
|
| Back to top | |
mograyback 
Missouri Fan
Red Patoka Sea
Member since Jul 2011
5486 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 7:46 pm to Wooly)
I thought the previews looked pretty bad, so I didn't go see it.
|
| Back to top | |
Carson123987
LSU Fan
Middle Court at The Rec
Member since Jul 2011
23166 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 8:18 pm to shuke33)
quote:
I thought Goggins should of had a bigger role.
Me too! Dude can act
Wooly, I know what you're saying. I think I would've enjoyed it more had I not hyped it up in my head so much. I still thought it was very good and the best movie so far this year
This post was edited on 12/28 at 8:19 pm
|
| Back to top | |
Wooly
USA Fan
Member since Feb 2012
11105 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 9:22 pm to Carson123987)
Thats why I said it is better than most of the crap called movies now... legit good movie
|
| Back to top | |
Wooly
USA Fan
Member since Feb 2012
11105 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 9:25 pm to Carson123987)
Every time I see goggins I think of him pulling the ball
DAMMIT DOWNTOWN!
|
| Back to top | |
Hugo Stiglitz
USA Fan
Unfunny gif and meme connoisseur
Member since Oct 2010
44909 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 9:59 pm to Wooly)
quote:
Im not sure what it was but the acting seemed off to me for some reason. First time we see sam jackson he is stuttering amd stuff then in the library he is spoken like a rhodes scholar.
Did you miss the part where he was doing book keeping?
|
| Back to top | |
Jcorye1
LSU Fan
Tom Terrific (greater than) Brees
Member since Dec 2007
23391 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 10:08 pm to Hugo Stiglitz)
quote:
Did you miss the part where he was doing book keeping?
Fwiw, I know plenty of complete idiots that can keep the books.
|
| Back to top | |
Froman
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
18687 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 10:10 pm to Wooly)
It wasn't a great movie. It was a good movie, though. It needed a lot more editing.
|
| Back to top | |
Sterling Archer
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2012
724 posts
| re: anyone else think django was just.... ok? (Posted on 12/28/12 at 10:37 pm to Wooly)
I just thought it was ok as well. Entertaining but it was great or anything IMO.
|
| Back to top | |
