She believed in poverty and suffering, raised money on the backs of the poor, suffering Indians and never did anything to improve the medical care or lessen their suffering. She just gave money to the Vatican.
What did she do that was "good"?
This just seems like revisionists history bull shite to me.
Yes, she may have not performed "miracles" (like some are saying she did to push her Sainthood), and yes she may have raised money and given it to the vatican, but to act like the lady did nothing good in the world is laughable.
After she died, it seems like some people are just going out of there way to hate and pile on a Catholic lady who spent her whole like working with the poor and people in poverty.
You can believe what you want, I have read multiple articles "criticizing" her, but they all seem to have an agenda and none of the articles tell of any good she did.
I am not a very religion person by any means, but it seems like a lot of anti-Catholic people just being douche bags to a lady who has passed away simply because she is glorified by the Catholics and people enjoy hating on Catholic beliefs and tearing things down they believe in.
But I'm sure you are correct, she literally did no good in the world and people would be better off if she was never born.
This post was edited on 11/22 at 9:59 pm