rondoGo see Lincoln the Movie and get GroundedIt seems pretty fricking clear to me that a lot of you tards don't know what the definition of '"tyrant" is. That....or your over use of hyperbole has muddled your ability to make a cogent argument.
Well, R...I won't speak for all the 'tards', but since I use that word in reference to Obama on occasion...to my understanding...a tyrant would be some one who rules contrary to true moral principle, and does so without the 'consent of the governed'. If 'governed' even applies in the case of tyrannical rule. Think ObamaCare, for starters.
Bottom line...Obama is a Socialist ideologue; an egalatarian who believes that the democratic majority should assume rulership. And he/they make the (misguided) assumption that they can and will do so, with the true-moral-principle high ground as legitimizing both their right and even a responsibility to do so. That's why they feel justified using lies or tactics that employ a 'end justifies the means' paradigm.
Such is no more than a mob rule form of government which acts on the basis of envy and a desire to mitigate their own sorry work ethic, in a lot of cases. They foolishly believe that by muzzling the prosperity of over acheivers and punishing the 'greedy' rich...that they will live better. Or at least will be *equal*.
Fool's gold. And immoral. And impractical. And short-lived with disastrous when employed.
And in Obama's case, with his "white men's greed drives a world in need" spiritual mentor...big trouble. Especially when hell breaks loose.
Watch and see who suffers when the economy collapses, and the mob rule tyrants make their play. It'll be the very mob who bought into this lie and started this crap.
Live and learn.