Romney won Style, Obama won Substance - Page 8 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Tiger n Miami AU83
Auburn Fan
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
33709 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

He is talking about the fact that costs incurred in closing the factory (like all freaking business costs) are considered deductible. Hence he concludes it is a tax break. Yeah, this is some solid substance


Gotta laugh at that. Wow a legit business expense is deductible. Breaking news. Major tax break.

At least I know I am not missing anything I should be aware of now.






Back to top
Newbomb Turk
Navy Fan
perfectanschlagen
Member since May 2008
9961 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

Unfortunately, as Romney aptly pointed out, "but you've been president for FOUR years."


I was waiting for that line for a while. During the first part of the debate, Odummy's favorite "word" was "WANNA," as in, "We wanna do this," and "We wanna do that."

And, Romney finally got him. I would have phrased it a little differently -- something along the lines of, "Wait, you had TWO years where you could have done ANYTHING you wanted. You controlled the Congress and the Presidency. You didn't do a damn thing about the economy and, more importantly JOBS. And, now you're going to tell us all the things you WANNA do in the future?"






Back to top
TigerBait2008
LSU Fan
Death Valley
Member since Jun 2008
16434 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

Tiger n Miami AU83


I thought you kept your stupidity on the sec rant, Guess I was wrong..






Back to top
Taxing Authority
LSU Fan
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
22108 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

. Just stating his tax plan is balanced with cuts and revenue increases was sufficient in all honesty.
Tax plan? What tax plan? He's had four years... how balanced with cuts and revenues are his budget proposals? Oh... wait... they're so unserious they have yet to receive a single vote... you think he's suddenly going to get serious in years 5,6,7,8 as a lame duck?



This post was edited on 10/4 at 11:24 am


Back to top
igoringa
LSU Fan
Tejas
Member since Jun 2007
9533 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

but everyone pretty much knows there will be a net benefit to the wealthy with a 20% rate cut no matter how many deductions are removed.


Has he not consistently disagreed with this assertion?

You have said he has done a 180 after 15 times. What is the 180. He said the same thing yesterday as he always has.

You disagreeing does not equal a 180. Sorry that his presentation took the knees out of your boy.






Back to top
90proofprofessional
LSU Fan
Member since Mar 2004
8679 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


There was no winner in the "substance" category.





Back to top
Tiger n Miami AU83
Auburn Fan
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
33709 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

I thought you kept your stupidity on the sec rant, Guess I was wrong..


I'm everywhere numbnuts. Bow down.






Back to top
Tiger n Miami AU83
Auburn Fan
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
33709 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

There was no winner in the "substance" category.


I go with winner by default as I believe Romney backtracked on a plan that had little substance to begin with.






Back to top
Choctaw
Navy Fan
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
49627 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

Obama won Substance








Back to top
90proofprofessional
LSU Fan
Member since Mar 2004
8679 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


k





Back to top
Tiger n Miami AU83
Auburn Fan
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
33709 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

Has he not consistently disagreed with this assertion?


Not sure. But every analysis of his plan I have seen project a net benefit to the wealthy no matter specifics are lacking.






Back to top
themunch
LSU Fan
At home/ at work/ it's all the same
Member since Jan 2007
9252 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


Obama didn't win jack.








Back to top
jcole4lsu
Virginia Fan
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
26782 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

Tiger n Miami AU83


you really are a loon. nobody, nobody is saying obama won on any level. only you and vor are here to tell the entire world differently.

you are a sad, sad little man.






Back to top
UncleLogger
LA-Lafayette Fan
Freetown
Member since Jan 2008
2333 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


Horse shite.





Back to top
Newbomb Turk
Navy Fan
perfectanschlagen
Member since May 2008
9961 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

Tiger n Miami AU83


Seriously, I think you had a littl ... er, make that ... WAY too much of the Kool-Aid.







Back to top
Gmorgan4982
LSU Fan
Member since May 2005
98593 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

Romney won style, both are lying scum
FIFY






Back to top
davesdawgs
Georgia Fan
Georgia
Member since Oct 2008
16518 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

Obama won Substance


I can only conclude that you must be all in for Obama. Obama has not substance relative to business/the economy because he has never managed a business in his life. In 2008, voters basically elected a man who was not qualified to be POTUS.






Back to top
Tigerlaff
LSU Fan
Member since Jan 2010
9673 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


Luckily, Obama showed us in 2008 that style matters more than substance. Thanks for the analysis.





Back to top
taylormade
Alabama Fan
Tumbleton
Member since Jan 2011
7813 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


Obama Substance..









Back to top
igoringa
LSU Fan
Tejas
Member since Jun 2007
9533 posts

re: Romney won Style, Obama won Substance


quote:

Not sure. But every analysis of his plan I have seen project a net benefit to the wealthy no matter specifics are lacking.


OK, so you are not sure what his formal position was before, but you are concluding he did a 180 (eventhough you dont know what his formal position was). Seriously, that is what you are saying right?

Oh analysts disagree.... OK then, I guess people disagreeing is a 180






Back to top


Back to top




//