IMO on the debate. Romney crushed him in debating style and oratory.
Romney backtracked completely on his tax plan and offered nothing about anything he would do except for ideals with no real substance or specifics. I think he was even dishonest about his tax plan.
However, he spoke well and in an impassioned manner.
So, the question is which matters more? Style or substance?
I sorta think style in this format as I think most people don't understand enough to differentiate on the substance.
This post was edited on 10/3 at 9:50 pm