Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas! - Page 146 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Supernova
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Jan 2012
2645 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


Worthless team is a worthless team





Back to top
  Replies (0)
laxer17
LSU Fan
NOLA
Member since Jan 2012
3452 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!








Back to top
  Replies (0)
iliveinabox
LSU Fan
Member since Aug 2011
18138 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


SICK catch






Back to top
dengle
Columbia Fan
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
4897 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


Triplett sounded happy to award the first down.





Back to top
sicboy
Michigan State Fan
Because Pip-Boy
Member since Nov 2010
33556 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!








Back to top
  Replies (0)
LSURulzSEC
LSU Fan
Lafayette via Oakdale
Member since Aug 2004
51432 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


Pa-the-tic...





Back to top
Elleshoe
Southeastern LA Fan
Founder of the Boxtard Nation
Member since Jun 2004
121663 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


frick this season. Time to suck for the best possible pick.





Back to top
LSUZombie
New Orleans Saints Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2008
13087 posts
 Online 

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


That's ball game. This team fricking sucks and I don't care anymore. This game was heart breaking.

I'll be cheering for a roster turnover and a high draft pick






Back to top
  Replies (0)
LL7
LSU Fan
Houston
Member since Mar 2010
170 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


Don't blame Hartley. Blame the idiot who held on the made field goal.





Back to top
Bravescd14
Alabama Fan
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2009
401 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


ggwp





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Walt OReilly
Wisconsin Fan
Cubs Fan
Member since Oct 2005
76443 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


not me

i enjoy hearing troys voice






Back to top
  Replies (0)
St Augustine
New Orleans Saints Fan
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
42171 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


What a horrific attempt at a blitz. Just nonchalantly jogged into the line.





Back to top
BourgsTheWord
Southeastern LA Fan
Member since Apr 2008
23762 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


This guy.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
LSU Coyote
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
13140 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


That catch.. lol





Back to top
  Replies (0)
tubucoco
New Orleans Saints Fan
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
22133 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


This team is startin to resemble the old Saints. Thought I never say that.





Back to top
Pectus
New Orleans Saints Fan
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
45210 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


Haha. How was that possible?

I'M PROUD OF MY TEAM!!!






Back to top
  Replies (0)
HailHailtoMichigan!
Michigan Fan
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
11526 posts
 Online 

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


The worst thing about this game is that it will give Saints fans some hope.





This post was edited on 9/30 at 6:43 pm


Back to top
busbeepbeep
New Orleans Saints Fan
:nolarugby.com:
Member since Jan 2004
9715 posts
 Online 

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


frick everything





Back to top
lordguill
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Dec 2005
19964 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


quote:

Triplett sounded happy to award the first down.



I noticed that too.






Back to top
CajunSoldier225
Army Fan
The Cajun Heartland
Member since Aug 2011
781 posts

re: Final | Saints 27 @ Packers 28 | Brees tied Unitas!


0 - 4 . . .







Back to top


Back to top