Started By
Message

re: Why are so few truly Automatic guns used in Mass Shootings?

Posted on 10/6/17 at 9:53 am to
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21863 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 9:53 am to
quote:

What stops most criminals from robbing banks instead of convenience stores and indivudals?


Bank robberies are investigated aggressively by the FBI, happen in places with tons of camera, have multiple protections to ensure that even getting away with money isn't that profitable, and still happen all the time.

Robbing your local convenience store usually means you don't get caught, and you make off with a tiny amount of money.

What's your point?
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
21863 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 9:55 am to
quote:

The Founders couldn't have possibly have seen a future in which an idiot could get on the internet and spew their ignorant views for thousand, nay millions, of people to read everyday, so therefor logically the internet is not protected by the first amendment.



You'd be wrong. The founders had newspapers, which reached as high (higher?) a percentage of the population than the internet. They had no problem with protecting speech.

quote:

The founders couldn't have possibly conceived of video evidence conclusively proving a person committed a crime, therefor when there is video evidence of a crime the fifth amendment doesn't matter. No need for a trial .


Video evidence doesn't fall under the fifth amendment. What kind of insane logic is this?

Maybe next time you'd like to post, do it sober. You'll make more sense, and perhaps you'll even make a cogent point. Unlike this time.

Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43318 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 9:59 am to
quote:

You'd be wrong. The founders had newspapers, which reached as high (higher?) a percentage of the population than the internet. They had no problem with protecting speech.



Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34936 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Your legitimate justification for owning a weapon that fires more than 3 rounds is based in part on your preference to cripple pigs so they die slowly......I would posit that thus mind set is awfully close to that of a mass shooter of people.....not on par but very close.....


Holy frick are you stupid.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 10:52 am to
You make some very ignorant posts, but this is pretty bad.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34936 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 10:52 am to
quote:

BamaAtl


Damn you came back? I wonder why you still refuse to answer my question I've posted to you for 3 pages now.

Still waiting. You stupid arse mother fricker.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57090 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 10:54 am to
quote:

You'd be wrong. The founders had newspapers, which reached as high (higher?) a percentage of the population than the internet. They had no problem with protecting speech.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34936 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 10:55 am to
quote:

The founders had newspapers, which reached as high (higher?) a percentage of the population than the internet. They had no problem with protecting speech


Are you insinuating that in the late 1700s, 90%+ of the people in America had access to up to date news printing and had the ability to read this?

Surely this is not what you are insinuating.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48294 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 10:57 am to
quote:

You'd be wrong. The founders had newspapers, which reached as high (higher?) a percentage of the population than the internet. They had no problem with protecting speech.


The overall literacy rate around 1787 was about 50%. "Reaching the population" is pretty irrelevant of half of the people could not read the words.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
70989 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

I've shot truck loads of pigs.

quote:

If shooting them is the best means of controlling those pests it is much more effective to trap and dispatch.


I think you're full of shite.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
70989 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

The founders had newspapers, which reached as high (higher?) a percentage of the population than the internet.


Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Holy frick are you stupid.


Seriously......why would you prefer hogs die painfully and slowly? That is some sick shite my friend....and it sure as hell isnt somethung an ethical hunter would prefer. Shooting pigs is necessary...shooting pigs is even fun....intentionally inflicting excessive pain on any animal in the process of controlling a nuisance species is some psychotic shite. At least you are honest enough to admit it......
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42508 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

What stops a mass murderer from using a truly automatic weapon? Why don't we see more of them used?

Who can afford to practice fire a .50 cal machine gun??
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:28 pm to
[quote]quote:
I've shot truck loads of pigs.

quote:
If shooting them is the best means of controlling those pests it is much more effective to trap and dispatch.


I think you're full of shite.[/quopigs are relatively easy to trap and obviously it is much more effective to shoot them at near point blank range than having them at a distance and able to run away.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34936 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Seriously......why would you prefer hogs die painfully and slowly?


i prefer they die. i dont care if its instant or drawn out. frick hogs. let me guess, you use poison on ant hills? you spray wasps with wasp spray.. imagine the torture those animals are going through. get off your high horse. you got called out on your bullshite.
quote:

.intentionally inflicting excessive pain on any animal in the process of controlling a nuisance species is some psychotic shite.

i dont intentionally do shite. i dont aim at their gut or hind quarter and think ohh suffer hog suffer! but i also dont give a frick if thats where it gets hit. see the difference?
quote:

At least you are honest enough to admit it......

you really are dumb.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:47 pm to
"Idc if I wound wild hogs. I'd rather wound them and them die slowly and painfully. frick hogs."

Well your honesty was short lived....first you say you'd prefer they die slowly....then you say you don't care when it is pointed out that is some sick shite. So which time were you lying?

By the way, if you have really killed any hogs you'd know that shooting them in the arse with an AR won't kill them at all.....that shite will just scab over and the bastard might rub a little slower while it is making baby pigs left and right......


I have no problem at all with hunting anything legally......but saying you'd prefer your prey suffer than die as quickly as humanly possible is some sick shite....that's why you are trying to change your original statement
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34936 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

"Idc if I wound wild hogs. I'd rather wound them and them die slowly and painfully. frick hogs."



yeah... i dont care. i dont intentionally aim to draw out their suffering you stupid shite. id rather hogs die slowly and painfully than a deer.
quote:

By the way, if you have really killed any hogs you'd know that shooting them in the arse with an AR won't kill them at all.....that shite will just scab over and the bastard might rub a little slower while it is making baby pigs left and right......

ive killed tons of shite. i have tons of land. and no shite a round to the hind quarter wont kill it. it will make it suffer though. they are tough sons of bitches.

quote:

I have no problem at all with hunting anything legally......but saying you'd prefer your prey suffer than die as quickly as humanly possible is some sick shite....that's why you are trying to change your original statement


i want them dead. i dont care how they die. why do you spray wasps with wasp spray? why do you poison ants? that is torture to them. get off your high horse. hogs are shite, they are invasive and do millions of dollars in damage. they are garbage.
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

quote: I've shot truck loads of pigs. quote: If shooting them is the best means of controlling those pests it is much more effective to trap and dispatch. I think you're full of shite.



By the way in the Savannah river valley of Georgia it don't take many pigs to make a truck load....the bastards get pretty big in that area!,,


So about 15 minutes of research on state wildlife agencies sights will confirm that remote sprung trapping is the most effective means of eradicating pigs. Shooting them at night over bait has actually improved their breeding capabilities because the bastards are eating more easily and spending more time fricking.....because very few people are going to sit over bait from the time it is placed until it is gone. Pigs, being pretty damn smart critters, ain't coming around bait that stinks of people and aren't going to come around it when people are around. Of course anyone who has ever shot them at night over bait knows that it is FAR from automatic and takes a lot of time spent in the field......
Posted by germandawg
Member since Sep 2012
14135 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 6:05 pm to
quote:


i want them dead. i dont care how they die. why do you spray wasps with wasp spray? why do you poison ants? that is torture to them. get off your high horse. hogs are shite, they are invasive and do millions of dollars in damage. they are garbage.




I spray insects of all types because it is the most effective way of controlling the bastards.....I don't water the insecticide down so they will suffer even more because it makes me happy to make them suffer like you originally said about pigs.

Hogs are invasive and destroying habitat and native species numbers. They are slo fun to shoot.....can be very challenging as they are smarter than deer and are at least as good at staying hidden in plain sight.....it is nearly impossible to control them with any method....I read just recently that in parts of Texas you have to kill 10-12 for every one that isn't killed to simply keep them at their current numbers....they don't do anything but eat, shite and frick.....they are pests just like ants and houseflies.....but saying that you prefer they die painfully and slowly is just sick.....
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
34936 posts
Posted on 10/6/17 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

So about 15 minutes of research on state wildlife agencies sights will confirm that remote sprung trapping is the most effective means of eradicating pigs. Shooting them at night over bait has actually improved their breeding capabilities because the bastards are eating more easily and spending more time fricking..


we have 4 traps around our property. 99% of the pigs i kill are one shot through the ear at close range. but when i want to kill them at night with some friends, one sack of corn aint gonna help the pigs all that much bud.
quote:

Pigs, being pretty damn smart critters, ain't coming around bait that stinks of people and aren't going to come around it when people are around.


i put corn out that morning. hunt it that night..... have yet to have a problem with them not showing up.
quote:

Of course anyone who has ever shot them at night over bait knows that it is FAR from automatic and takes a lot of time spent in the field.....
not in areas that have an actual hog problem. but sure. maybe where you are from.
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram