Started By
Message

re: Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected

Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:52 pm to
Posted by BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
218 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:52 pm to
I never said I was kidding. I said I thought it was 3rd down. But you're all just whining and bitching like females, thus the jokes.

Why are you trying to put a damper on things Drew?
She still loves you as a friend, the kids will turn out fine.
Posted by BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
218 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:55 pm to
I believe the point y'all made was that a timeout should've been called.

The point I made was that it may have killed some SUPER SLIM chance we had anyway, but that isn't why we lost. Of all the things that happened y'all bitch about this. What about starting to use Hunter a lot on the 1st 2 downs just recently? Waiting till the end of the game to put Louis in? Calling deep shots when we could've dinked and dunked to a 3 td victory?

But no, you want to bitch about a timeout that DIDN'T frickING MATTER
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

BaBaDoo


You are dumb.

You are not funny.

You need to consider drinking a glass of bleach.
Posted by BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
218 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:57 pm to
I am in no way defending Les. Coaching other than the offense until now, has been poor all year. Raymond can't teach technique apparently and Chavis has pussy gameplans.
Posted by BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
218 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:58 pm to
You're a virgin.

You like visors.

WHERE IS THE REST OF YOUR HAT?!?
Posted by Drew Orleans
Member since Mar 2010
21577 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:58 pm to
We're bitching about all of it.

The most brain dead fricking move of the game was the no call then late call TO. It is and always will be inexcusable. Les is stupid.
Posted by PurpleAndGold86
Member since Jun 2012
11036 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

Who cares? We were fricking terrible the entire game.



So we should just give up? What a retarded comment. You also say the odds weren't necessarily any better for getting down the field than the kicker missing. Well the chances for a block and the kid missing were the EXACT same whether there were 25 seconds or 6 seconds on the clock, so why the frick not give yourself a few seconds to try something??
Posted by BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
218 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 6:59 pm to
In 6 months you've made 8000 posts on a message board bro. Get at me.
Posted by BaBaDoo
Member since Aug 2011
218 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 7:00 pm to
NO IT WASN'T
This is my point exactly. You're going to sum up a football game on one hypothetical scenario. YOU ARE DUMB

I'd vote on either of the throws that were picked in the end zone.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34826 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Statisticians: What is the % that calling TO with 20 seconds would've affected


We've got one of the best KO return guys in the nation. He'd have been pumped with adrenaline.

Rationalizations aside...INDEFENSIBLE.
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

In 6 months you've made 8000 posts on a message board bro. Get at me.



I have no life. Hence the reason for my 8000 awesome posts.


You are an idiot. Hence the reason for your 62 retarded posts.
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 7:49 pm to
Well, we're talking fractions of a percent.

But still, isn't a .1% chance of winning better than .01%?

Why throw away a one in a thousand chance for a 1 in ten thousand?

FOR ABSOLUTELY NO REASON.

It was painfully obvious that calling a timeout to give yourself a few plays was better than not, yet no timeout, that's just inexcusable, even if it only made a small mathetmatical difference.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64557 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 8:37 pm to
Was it third down or fourth down?
Posted by TigerJeff
the Emerald Coast
Member since Oct 2006
16356 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 9:13 pm to
I predict a 64 percent better chance of success in UGA and OM games if the defense had rushed the QB w/ more than 4 players.
Posted by airbornetiger
SATX
Member since Sep 2006
1416 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 9:22 pm to
Crazy thought....but part of me thinks the no time out was deliberate. METT had 3 INTs and had not played well the past 2 weeks. Had Les called TO n we lost (which we would have done) the heat would have been on Mett and the young D....by not calling the TO the heat all becomes directed toward him and not his players---now his players refocus and rally on the field to defend Miles.....CLM IS NOT as dumb as you all think he is--after all he is making $4M a year.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 9:26 pm to
Well let's see what could have happened...

1. Missed FG
2. Blocked FG
3. Penalty on ole miss- retry FG
4. Bobbled snap
5. Made FG

4 out of the 5 are good for lsu. Calling TO with 6 seconds would make almost all of them meaningless.
Posted by SBC
Member since Oct 2005
6868 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 9:49 pm to
Less than 1%
Posted by mojoebigdog
louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
694 posts
Posted on 10/21/13 at 10:08 pm to
We understand but how many games will it take our head coach to learn managing clock is important part of game. The guy makes millions of dollars a year with a first class staff. Do we forget that same issue happened few years ago in Oxford.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram