- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: An Ingram Thread: What's The Story With Him Going Forward
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:25 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:25 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
if you run a non-biased statistical comparison, you will see numbers generated that aren't associated with any ingramisms.
It's nice to see that you passively acknowledge you have nothing, which leads to more stupid jokes out of you.
1
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:25 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
You can't look at those numbers and say Ingram's availability has influenced the play calling
We are running using the screen pass. MI has never been apart of that.
Addition through subtraction.
I will trust CSP judgement on MI's skill at the screen game.
With Sproles and PT in at the same time as I'm sure you know they can both run or catch out of that formation. Worked very well against the bears.
Anyone here will tell you I battled chad and others over MI for two plus years.
My eyes finally sided with those who said he just doesn't fit here.
call it hate if you wish i just got tired of defending the pic.
This post was edited on 10/9/13 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:26 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
It's nice to see that you passively acknowledge you have nothing, which leads to more stupid jokes out of you.
when you present something worth a frick, i'll give you something worth a frick.
3 years worth of evidence and you're yapping like a bitch.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:26 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
You guys are just so blinded by Ingram hate that you aren't looking at anything objectively.
I don't hate Ingram.
I also don't think he's played well at all for us.
I think we have done better the last three weeks on offense than we did the first two weeks.
I'm not going to say that the reason we've done better is because Ingram's been hurt.
I'm just saying we are playing better.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:27 pm to Suntiger
quote:
I also don't think he's played well at all for us.
then you aren't being objective duh.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:27 pm to BananaHammock
Mark has a turf toe. Very painful and unable to push off of with enough power to run over a baby
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:28 pm to Suntiger
quote:
I'm just saying we are playing better.
we've kind of been better despite our line playing kind of worse. double up on that math.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:29 pm to goatmilker
quote:
We are running using the screen pass. MI has never been apart of that.
Addition through subtraction.
Do you have any numbers showing we are running more screens with Ingram inactive?
quote:
I will trust CSP judgement on MI's skill at the screen game.
Did I ever say to use him that way?
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:29 pm to Chad504boy
Opposing teams are stacking the box to make the Saints one-dimensional.
Only problem is, that one dimension includes Drew Brees.
Only problem is, that one dimension includes Drew Brees.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:30 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Do you have any numbers showing we are running more screens with Ingram inactive?
he does but numbers are tainted with irrelevant variables.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:30 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
we've kind of been better despite our line playing kind of worse.
Not better rushing the ball.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:30 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
he does but numbers are tainted with irrelevant variables.
frick off Chad, people with more than half a brain are talking.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:31 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Not better rushing the ball.
we're better at rushing the ball but not better at rush blocking.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:31 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
when you present something worth a frick, i'll give you something worth a frick.
All of my posted numbers are worth more than anything you've said.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:31 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Do you have any numbers showing we are running more screens with Ingram inactive?
Did you not see the bears game?
quote:
Did I ever say to use him that way?
Well to not makes him a 3rd or 4th stringer on this team.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:32 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
we're better at rushing the ball but not better at rush blocking
Yea. The run blocking is bad when Ingram is out, but was good when he was in? You're going with that?Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:32 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
frick off Chad, people with more than half a brain are talking.
you're defending three years worth below average last place on the team in rushing averages. it's quite sad.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:32 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
The run blocking is bad when Ingram is out, but was good when he was in? You're going with that?
the blocking definitely regressed when ingram went out due to injuries on the line.
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:33 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Did you not see the bears game?
Can you just post a number instead of bias?
quote:
Well to not makes him a 3rd or 4th stringer on this team.
Who says he should be any higher than that?
Posted on 10/9/13 at 4:33 pm to liquid rabbit
are there any olines anymore that just maul defenses. This West coast offenses started by Bill Walsh has spun on new era.
Page 3 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News