Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Danny Granger's future

Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:39 pm
Posted by GeauxTGRZ
PTal
Member since Oct 2005
4768 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:39 pm
He is owed $14 million next year. Some say to keep him at the 3 so George can move back to the 2 and have another go at it with the Heat. Some say to trade him now. GMs still covet him..

As a Pacers fan, I say keep him unless you get Bledsoe by some miracle..
Posted by GeauxTGRZ
PTal
Member since Oct 2005
4768 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:41 pm to
Granger's final year as well
Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
52279 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

Granger's final year as well


Exactly why I'd take my chances and go at the Heat with a healthy roster.

DWade isn't getting any younger, and the Pacers already showed they can bully Bosh with West and Hibbert.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92876 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:44 pm to
Keep him!!!
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13604 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:46 pm to
i say move him and get an elite ball handler. the team proved they are fine without him, add a piece that can put you over the top against MIA, and resign west.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83922 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:46 pm to
Granger has offensive skill the Pacers need. I'd keep him.
Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
52279 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

get an elite ball handler


All this means is get anyone but DJ Augustine.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27418 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:55 pm to
I think the question is: can the Pacers re-sign West with Grangers contract on the books?

If so, keep him. If not, move him.
This post was edited on 6/26/13 at 10:00 pm
Posted by biglil3
West Monroe
Member since Jan 2010
2049 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:57 pm to
Keep him....had he been healthy the Pacers would have won in 6, maybe even 5
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76624 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:58 pm to
Some have hinted at a Granger (NOLA native) for Eric Gordon (Indy native) deal. Works with salaries and needs though Pacers would need to throw in their first rounder (#23) to give it more credence.
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13604 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Keep him....had he been healthy the Pacers would have won in 6, maybe even 5
probably a sweep. of everyone in the playoffs. like a perfect 16-0.
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27418 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

Some have hinted at a Granger (NOLA native) for Eric Gordon (Indy native) deal. Works with salaries and needs though Pacers would need to throw in their first rounder (#23) to give it more credence.


The thing with trades is that both sides have to have a desire to do the deal.
Posted by Jwho77
cyperspace
Member since Sep 2003
76624 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 10:01 pm to
Posted by GeauxTGRZ
PTal
Member since Oct 2005
4768 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 10:11 pm to
I'm leaning towards keeping him and west because of granger's defense on lebron.

Paul probably does a better job defending lebron but with George guarding the shooter on the 3 point line, I like it better...

Either with Bledsoe, Gordon, or Mayo, the Pacers need a scoring 2 guard.
Posted by boXerrumble
Member since Sep 2011
52279 posts
Posted on 6/26/13 at 10:47 pm to
I got 2 downvotes? For what?
Posted by Ryan3232
Valet driver for TD staff
Member since Dec 2008
25774 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 12:03 am to
If you're the pacers, you keep him.

They were a go-to scorer away from beating the heat. Damn just thinking of the lineup,

Hill
George
Granger
West
Hibbert


Thats a solid lineup. Very solid
Posted by bayouboy33
Lowcountry
Member since Oct 2006
2379 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 6:02 am to
Bird coming back means Granger stays
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61420 posts
Posted on 6/27/13 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Bird coming back means Granger stays


I think Bird coming back means he doesn't want someone else getting credit for a championship team that he built. He'll move Granger if that makes them better. If they were willing to be a tax team when they have to pay Paul George, they could make a pretty good sales pitch to Iggy with the cap space freed up by dumping Granger. That would make them a legit contender.
This post was edited on 6/27/13 at 8:03 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram