- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Colorado Magazine ban of 15 rounds passes through committee 7-4
Posted on 2/13/13 at 11:55 am to NimbleCat
Posted on 2/13/13 at 11:55 am to NimbleCat
While I agree with Olympic Arms motivation and loyalties, I am not sure I agree with their means. Certainly the hard working LEO's, First Responders and other government workers were not the only persons to vote for such laws. It might even be reasonably believed that they did not even constitute the majority voice for such idiocy.
A more appropriate letter would simply say we are moving to a state that respects the rights of its citizens and would like to illiterate prior to leaving the financial impact this departure will make. Then list the number of jobs being lost to another state, and the amount of tax dollars departing the state.
A more appropriate letter would simply say we are moving to a state that respects the rights of its citizens and would like to illiterate prior to leaving the financial impact this departure will make. Then list the number of jobs being lost to another state, and the amount of tax dollars departing the state.
1
Posted on 2/13/13 at 11:58 am to Bleeding purple
I totally agree with it. LEO leaders in the NY area have been standing behind the political calls for the bans. Let the standing majority replace the association reps and make their voices heard if they disagree with the assault on 2nd Amendment rights.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 12:03 pm to Alahunter
quote:
I totally agree with it. LEO leaders in the NY area have been standing behind the political calls for the bans. Let the standing majority replace the association reps and make their voices heard if they disagree with the assault on 2nd Amendment rights.
I agree. Most of the law enforcement there has an elitist attitude. And if they don't, well too bad for them living in New York.
You either cut off the whole state or you serve the whole state. When you start to pick and choose it defeats the purpose of what was planned to be done. Someone could just as easily lie and say they are pro gun and receive the business of Olympic. I agree with their stance - all of New York or none of it.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 12:09 pm to Knuckle Child
quote:
Shreveport? That's Texas masquerading as Louisiana
Posted on 2/13/13 at 12:50 pm to bapple
quote:
I agree with their stance - all of New York or none of it.
That was kind of my point. All of Ney York or none of it (just excluding LEO's etc).
If they really want an all or none they need to pick up and get out.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 6:30 pm to Bleeding purple
quote:
If they really want an all or none they need to pick up and get out.
They're located in Washington. They just said they wouldn't do business with New York.
Posted on 2/13/13 at 6:57 pm to bapple
frick Colorado.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News