Started By
Message

re: Hall of Famers Respond About this years non-class

Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:15 pm to
Posted by motorbreath
New Orleans Saints fan
Member since Jun 2004
6381 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

Not by their vote and listening to Verducci and Russo speak. I think they honestly believe they're the caretakers of the game, not the public


I think you are misunderstanding them. These are people with a huge responsibility to elect the hall of fame members and they take it very seriously, as they should.

Also, Verducci and Russo are 2 of almost 600 BBWAA writers eligible to vote for the HOF.
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
139837 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:18 pm to
What do you see the HOF as? Is it a museum to tell history or is it a place to honor players?

We both know its not best of best anymore.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36105 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

Steroids alone didn't. Smaller parks, more teams, tighter strike zones, tighter wound balls, shift in way game was played. You can reasonably argue that greenies affected games daily more than steroids. Plus it wasn't just hitters on steroids like the media wants to present.


respectfully but completely disagree

steroids made some good players into MVPs (like Ken Caminiti), or guys who sets new standards (40/40 club of Canseco) or made great players like Bonds otherworldly. They changed the ways that pitchers had to approach guys like Bonds and McGwire because there was no safe place in teh strike zone to throw them a pitch - accordingly their batting averages and walk totals as well as their power numbers skyrocketed. They restored Clemens from a washed up pitcher to a guy who absolutely dominated in his early 40s

you can talk about ballparks, balls being wound tight, special bats etc - but IMO all that is just rationalization with the intent of avoiding the obvious. There are tons of ways to cheat - but nothing comes close to what steroids/PEDs did to change performance in baseball
Posted by motorbreath
New Orleans Saints fan
Member since Jun 2004
6381 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:33 pm to
It is the best of the best but there is a criteria that has to be met.

quote:

5. Voting: Voting shall be based upon the player's record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played.


This is open to interpretation and different writers will interpret it differently but I can honestly say i can't hold it against any writer who wants to keep Clemons out based on this or a writer who votes for Clemens.
Posted by Matisyeezy
End of the bar, Drunk
Member since Feb 2012
16624 posts
Posted on 1/10/13 at 11:52 pm to
Kaline, Gossage, and other former players already in the Hall who are opposed to the stars of the modern era being inducted are liars or, at best, deceiving themselves. As other posters have said, there's a LONG history of "cheating" in baseball -- by that I mean players will jump upon things that give them a competitive advantage if they aren't explicitly outlawed or there's no real effort made to enforce the banning of these tactics.

Nearly every one of those old windbags would have jumped at the chance to pop a pill or inject a serum that would give them the ability to hit 500+ homeruns or still be clocked at 98 mph after 100 pitches. They utilized whatever they could back then, players today do the same. If you want to invoke the integrity clause, it means you have to turn a critical eye on some of the players already enshrined in the Hall. Unless you want to start kicking people out, you're ahead to let the next generation enter.

And frick those guys anyway. Without the Steroid Era many baseball teams would probably be in a lot more precarious financial shape than they are now. The ADHD generation isn't so big on baseball, or so it seems to me. Disclaimer: I'm a part of that generation
Posted by MintBerry Crunch
Member since Nov 2010
4828 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 10:01 am to
I think you mean greenies-->steroids as firearms-->guns
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36449 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Ty Cobb was a well known racist and uber prick

ty cobb wanted to play but none of us could stand the son of a bitch when he was alive, so we told him to stick it!
Posted by Tmacelroy12
Houston
Member since Aug 2012
5489 posts
Posted on 1/11/13 at 11:24 am to
If you ain't cheatin, you ain't tryin
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 1/13/13 at 7:36 pm to
Andre Dawson weighs in:
quote:

“The thing is, I played a long time in the majors, and a couple more in the minors, and I didn’t play with that many Hall of Fame-caliber ballplayers,” Dawson said. “I didn’t play against more than a few Hall of Famers.”

“I’m mad about what they did to the game. I think of Hank (Aaron) and Willie (Mays) and Mickey (Mantle), it makes me really angry,” Dawson said. “We worked really, really hard to get to a certain level. They did it with drugs.”
This post was edited on 1/13/13 at 7:49 pm
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 1/13/13 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

Nearly every one of those old windbags would have jumped at the chance to pop a pill or inject a serum that would give them the ability to hit 500+ homeruns or still be clocked at 98 mph after 100 pitches. They utilized whatever they could back then, players today do the same. If you want to invoke the integrity clause, it means you have to turn a critical eye on some of the players already enshrined in the Hall. Unless you want to start kicking people out, you're ahead to let the next generation enter.


Totally agree.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 1/13/13 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

5. Voting: Voting shall be based upon the player's record, playing ability, integrity, sportsmanship, character, and contributions to the team(s) on which the player played.


The character clause and using it to not vote a "steroids guy" vs someone like Tim Raines is a joke. Just like lots of the BB HOF voters are a joke.

Raines just got 52%.
McGwire got 16%
Sosa 12%
Palmerio 8%

And the justification was character?

Raines personally came out and said he used to slide on his stomach to keep from breaking glass or plastic cocaine containers he kept in his back pocket during games. So, it shows higher character to do lines of coke and tweek out during games than steriods?

Makes sense.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 1/13/13 at 7:50 pm to
I keep laughing at those borderline guys who feel the need to weigh in on this topic
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram