Started By
Message

re: Who was our SEC-East opponent going to be if TAMU hadn't

Posted on 12/5/12 at 7:14 am to
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
13940 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 7:14 am to
quote:

So, why did we have to keep South Carolina instead of Kentucky?


Why would anyone complain about USC being on our schedule when we beat them, it was a signature win, and a catalyst to the improvement of the offense (and certainly Jeremy Hill) for the second half of the season. You guys are nothing but a bunch of whiners.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 7:15 am to
Who cares? LSU beat A&M and USC both.
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17500 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 8:37 am to
LSU's scheduling pattern was like this:

UT, @ Vandy
UK, @ UT
USC, @ UK
UGA, @ USC
Vandy, @ UGA

Had expansion not occured, we would have played USC and @UK in 2012.

Bama's was like this:
UF, @USC
Vandy, @UF
UGA, @ Vandy
UK, @ UGA
USC, @ UK

They would have played UGa and @Vandy in 2012.

The SEC chose to take UGA off Bama's schedule in both 2012 and 2013. How nice is that.

The SEC kept LSU and UGA on LSU's schedule.

Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 10:00 am to
quote:

could be wrong but Im going with Georgia


same here. my understanding is that bama had georgia and lsu had kentucky. therefore, the "temporary" schedule that the bama dude did up made our schedule tougher and bama's easier. fancy that.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
23843 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 10:01 am to
quote:

And who was Alabama's SEC-East opponent going to be?


UGA

The bottom line is the two teams with the easiest cross division schedules made the SECCG.
This post was edited on 12/5/12 at 10:05 am
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 10:06 am to
quote:

You guys are nothing but a bunch of whiners


i think the "temporary" scheduling should be investigated. it is a fact that lsu's schedule got tougher and bama's got easier. i have not seen a challenge that the schedule was done by a confirmed bama graduate and fan (i think the ad's voted on it tho). the whole deal stinks and one certainly can argue that bama and georgia went to atlanta due to their schedule. whom beat whom ain't the only thing about a tougher schedule; the emotional price and the injury factors can be huge. look what injuries lsu had against florida; playing kentucky or mizzou probably wouldn't have taken near the toll. yes, bama and georgia did their share to get there but to argue, esp in the SEC, that the schedule is not a factor is bull shite. and that ain't whining.
Posted by Evolved Simian
Bushwood Country Club
Member since Sep 2010
20463 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 10:09 am to
quote:

quote:
And who was Alabama's SEC-East opponent going to be?



UGA

The bottom line is the two teams with the easiest cross division schedules made the SECCG.



We lost the Vandy return game, and the first UGA game. A&M replaced Vandy. Missouri replaced UGA.
Posted by LC412000
Any location where a plane flies
Member since Mar 2004
16673 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 10:24 am to
Kentucky - away
best SEC road trip
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17500 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 10:33 am to
quote:

it is a fact that lsu's schedule got tougher and bama's got easier.


I laid it all out in another thread.

LINK

Had expansion not taken place, each of clear preseason favorites (LSU/USC & Bama/UGA) were scheduled to play each other. LSU/USC obviously happened and knocked USC out of the race despite pounding UGA. UGA/Bama were scheduled to play in both '12 and '13, and will not play at all. The only other series that had the same fate was UF/Ole Miss.

The fact is, deliberate changes were made that resulted in LSU playing a much more difficult slate, and Alabama playing a much easier slate avoiding the top team in the east both years of the bridge schedule. Was it done purposly to benifit Bama? I can't say.

This post was edited on 12/5/12 at 10:34 am
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 11:15 am to
good Lord
Posted by The First Cut
Member since Apr 2012
13940 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 11:56 am to
quote:

i think the "temporary" scheduling should be investigated


Yeah, let's have Congress investigate this!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram