Started By
Message

re: NY "women only" cab company

Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:29 pm to
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

What safety reasons?
Ask women.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

You're mad because no girls like you.


Balleater is mad because he doesn't like girls.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
71968 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

so you don't think a private company should be allowed to make it's own choices as to the clientele it accepts?
Please tell me that you are being sarcastic.

Please.

I really don't feel like digging up your old posts in relation to private companies picking their clientele.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

What safety reasons?


quote:

Ask unreasonable and irrational women.


FIFY
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:34 pm to
I'm still waiting for noted Constitutional expert Dawgfaninca to tell us where the Constitution bans companies from discriminating by gender. I've got Eric Holder's PC Police on line 1, they're just rarin' to shut down every bar, club, gym, and private women's college in the country.
Posted by TheFolker
Member since Aug 2011
5182 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Ask women.



OK. What safety reasons?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35342 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

quote:

A lot of women call up cab companies and request a female driver for safety reasons.
This makes zero sense.
Perhaps, but that's not my call. Maybe they just want a random lesbian encounter. Who knows, this whole she cab business could be a front for Female on Female prostitution.

Now I'm sad I didn't come up with the idea.
Posted by DawgfaninCa
San Francisco, California
Member since Sep 2012
20092 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

I guess you could, but it might be a long wait for the one white guy to driver over to pick you up. You can request one now, but it would be up to the cab company to honor it. It could be seen as you discriminating gains the black cab driver.


If the companies don't have enough White drivers then the companies can have an outreach program to hire more White people.

Posted by sacredcow
Member since Dec 2012
73 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:49 pm to
Utterly failing to see how this affects anybody who isn't a woman who wants to (probably) pay more for a taxi that is guaranteed to be driven by a woman...

Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67510 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

quote:
A lot of women call up cab companies and request a female driver for safety reasons.

This makes zero sense.



It does when you believe that all PIV is rape.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

This is BS(Bitch shite).

This is only more evidence that women are segregationists.



Maybe they're just tired of getting taxis driven by pigs like yourself.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21821 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Why do you hate the US Constitution?


quote:

Why do you hate the US Constitution?


quote:

Why do you hate the US Constitution?


God you're a moron.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78813 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 1:29 pm to
This would make for a killer episode for Taxicab Confessions
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134817 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 1:37 pm to
I've come to the conclusion that the same people that yell and scream about equality also support Jim Crow ideas.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54201 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

by pigs like yourself.


Arnold Ziffel says
Posted by ocelot4ark
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2009
12458 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 2:02 pm to
Does the constitution allow for a company that provides a public service, which NYC considers taxi/car services to offer (licensing), to discriminate as to who they offer their public service? Or to discriminate in their hiring practices by refusing to hire men?

Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33826 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 2:07 pm to
I wonder what will happen when a trans/quad/gender neutral/gender confused/gender ambiguous/blah blah new PC term applies for a job or wants a ride...will be interesting.

quote:

so you don't think a private company should be allowed to make it's own choices as to the clientele it accepts?


lulz
This post was edited on 9/12/14 at 2:09 pm
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
67961 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 2:11 pm to
That is funny as hell coming from you. What was your position on the florist and bakery who didn't want to supply the gay weddings? As I recall it was quite the opposite.
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
18301 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 2:27 pm to
As stated before, libertarianism is consistent--progressivism isn't.
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33826 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 3:28 pm to
I'm curious to hear his reasoning on this one. Not sure where he went.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram