Started By
Message

re: When/How do we start punishing parents for disasterous parenting?

Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:07 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421408 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:07 am to
quote:

that seems extreme, kid cuts up in school parent looses welfare?

it wouldn't be some drastic response. obviously there would have to be some history and due process

but if you can't get your kid to school everyday and ensure he's punished at home for bad behavior, you don't deserve welfare/WIC/FS benefits for that child.

fyi, that's a "less government" solution

also this could theoretically be applied to things like obesity...you could change it from rescinding payments to something like, "if you have obese children, your food stamps are WIC-restricted" and you can't just get general food stamps again until your kids get healthy. this is a "throwing shite against the wall" guess
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56001 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:15 am to
quote:

not necessarily. i made a very specific point about social ostracizing those of bad culture. that's private and not public-based



explain

especially in this political climate where everything you say about someone else is seen as you being offensive to them.

quote:

it is, but that may not be an option (especially in the short term)


ok

quote:

oh no. they're at fault. when discussing this topic with liberals, the liberals will shift blame to the parents...and then offer no solution to the problem except possibly more redistributed money


I don't get this, your OP says punish parents, now you blame liberals for shifting blame to parents and not offering a solution.

quote:

i didn't say that. in fact i directly responded to a comment about this with "that's a bit extreme" (on p1)


sorry, I guess another way to put it is not get government aid or benefits for having children.

quote:

not true, but it would definitely be the easiest way


John and sue have a kid, but they aren't married, Sam (child) lives with Sue who works but also gets food stamps. How do you punish sue without more government intervention.

You take away all food stamps you aren't punishing sue rather you are changing policy to try and fix a situation.

You make a law that ups the requirement for food stamps that is more government.

You make a law that punishes those on food stamps for not buying healthy that is more government.

I really want to hear of a solution that uses limited government to no but somehow punishes a parent for not being a good parent, that would actually work and not hurt more people than it helps.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56001 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:17 am to
quote:

but if you can't get your kid to school everyday and ensure he's punished at home for bad behavior, you don't deserve welfare/WIC/FS benefits for that child.

fyi, that's a "less government" solution


that is an additional law, and more bureaucrats involved in schools, more paper work, etc etc etc.

yes people lose welfare and the like but you have to increase government to enforce this law you propose.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421408 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:25 am to
quote:

your OP says punish parents, now you blame liberals for shifting blame to parents and not offering a solution.


this is backbone of the OP

and this is one very easy target. a recurring theme in discussing people of lesser/poor culture is this double argument that develops from those defending bad decision makers/parents.

1. we cannot blame the children who exhibit poor behavior due to cultural influences, from their parents

2. we will not blame the parents or take steps to punish them for the resulting behavior found in #1


this is a thread about framing an argument in the face of liberals talking out of both sides of their mouth to avoid blaming people for their own bad decisions (or vicariously, via parenting). this is not some "bait and switch" post where i just brought up the argument/framing

quote:

I really want to hear of a solution that uses limited government

in an ideal world? removing the safety net...or limiting it to something like 12 months (doesn't have to be consecutive) for every 10 years of working, or something similar. that way there is a legit "safety net" for people in transitional periods, but they cannot live off the system long-term.

and i mean 12 months of anything you can think of. welfare, food stamps, section 8, WIC, medicaid, etc

one of the biggest reasons in terms of macro policy that we are where we are is due to the safety net (and the emerging culture of the lower class mindset). like i said earlier, shame doesn't exist and pride has dissolved.
This post was edited on 7/24/14 at 8:26 am
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56001 posts
Posted on 7/24/14 at 8:38 am to
quote:

this is backbone of the OP

and this is one very easy target. a recurring theme in discussing people of lesser/poor culture is this double argument that develops from those defending bad decision makers/parents.

1. we cannot blame the children who exhibit poor behavior due to cultural influences, from their parents

2. we will not blame the parents or take steps to punish them for the resulting behavior found in #1

this is a thread about framing an argument in the face of liberals talking out of both sides of their mouth to avoid blaming people for their own bad decisions (or vicariously, via parenting). this is not some "bait and switch" post where i just brought up the argument/framing


one of the biggest reasons in terms of macro policy that we are where we are is due to the safety net (and the emerging culture of the lower class mindset). like i said earlier, shame doesn't exist and pride has dissolved.



I see what your getting at I guess

quote:

in an ideal world? removing the safety net...or limiting it to something like 12 months (doesn't have to be consecutive) for every 10 years of working, or something similar. that way there is a legit "safety net" for people in transitional periods, but they cannot live off the system long-term.

and i mean 12 months of anything you can think of. welfare, food stamps, section 8, WIC, medicaid, etc



that would help but if part of your solution is to punish parents that doesn't do it.

Maybe you don't want to do that and I misread the OP, but it seems you want to punish parents.

Note: I think that reducing or even eliminating welfare is good because it causes the poor to become dependent on the government. Handouts aren't good for anyone, I think that there should be some type of government program that helps those who are poor to raise out of poverty, it should be private but if the private sector can't do it I'm fine with the government getting involved.

So to put it simply, I don't think punishing disastrous parenting is the best way to fix the major problem of the family in this country. Rather there needs to be a system sets up that helps parents parent better so to speak. Hand outs enable slothful living. If a parent is poor but has a kid or two there should be something that can help him/her to raise the child and eventually do that without help. Hopefully private charity can do it but if not the government should step in.
This post was edited on 7/24/14 at 8:40 am
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram