Started By
Message

re: Obamacare, not so fast

Posted on 7/22/14 at 12:59 pm to
Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 12:59 pm to
I think he will, unless they truly have something on him. He seemed to be worried about perception over constitutionality on his arse stupid ruling. Outside of that he has seemed to be a constitutionalist. Also anyone with half a brain can't help but see the shithole the country seems to be heading down. Frick trying to be perceived as political, just do the right thing.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10805 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 1:20 pm to
quote:


I'm not hoping for biased and intellectually bankrupt hacks. What's your basis for stating that? Or are you one of those hacks?


Edwards called it a not so subtle attempt to gut Obamacare. Does that sound like a judicial opinion or a political one?
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Fed appeals court panel says most Obamacare subsidies illegal


No problem; Obama has a pen and a phone.....
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 7/22/14 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

This'll go en banc and get reversed

You're assuming every liberal judge votes solely upon ideology and not law. I don't believe that's how it will play out.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram