Remington 870 tactical vs Mossberg 500 tactical - POLL TIME - Page 2 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Soul Gleaux
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2012
2431 posts

re: Remington 870 tactical vs Mossberg 500 tactical - POLL TIME


Team Mossberg checking in







Back to top
djangochained
LSU Fan
Gardere
Member since Jul 2013
3560 posts

re: Remington 870 tactical vs Mossberg 500 tactical - POLL TIME


quote:

Even better if he can find an older model in a pawn shop


How old we talking ?






Back to top
LongueCarabine
LSU Fan
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
1810 posts

re: Remington 870 tactical vs Mossberg 500 tactical - POLL TIME


I have both the Remington 870 which I put a short barrel on and the Mossberg 590A1.

The Mossberg has a better trigger and smoother action.

LC






Back to top
SabiDojo
South Alabama Fan
Open to any suggestions
Member since Nov 2010
32353 posts
 Online 

re: Remington 870 tactical vs Mossberg 500 tactical - POLL TIME


Flip a coin





Back to top
Nascar Fan
LSU Fan
Columbia La.
Member since Jul 2011
14561 posts

re: Remington 870 tactical vs Mossberg 500 tactical - POLL TIME


another vote for 870





Back to top
Buck_Rogers
Member since Jul 2013
177 posts

re: Remington 870 tactical vs Mossberg 500 tactical - POLL TIME


I don't think you can wrong with either, but for what it's worth Mossberg is the only shotgun to pass the Mil-Spec 3443E test.





Back to top
Crawdaddy
LSU Fan
Slidell
Member since Sep 2006
11932 posts
 Online 

re: Remington 870 tactical vs Mossberg 500 tactical - POLL TIME


quote:

I don't think you can wrong with either


true

I however am an 870 fan.




This post was edited on 7/3 at 8:18 am


Back to top
civiltiger07
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
598 posts

re: Remington 870 tactical vs Mossberg 500 tactical - POLL TIME


Well I was the guy that was looking for a tactical shotgun. Was leaning towards the 500. Ended up with an 870 mainly because the 500 selection was terrible at cabelas on Saturday.







Back to top


Back to top




//