Started By
Message

re: Why is this organization digging themselves in such a deep hole?

Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:36 pm to
Posted by Mickey Goldmill
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2010
23006 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:36 pm to
And what people seem to forget is you just can't tank for 3 years and actually make the most out of that. For one, the chances of all 3 of those picks being stars is almost 0.

Secondly, by the time all three have a year or two under their belt and are playing well, their rookie contracts are up and you can't afford them. See Oklahoma City. They have have the best luck in drafts in the last ten years yet they couldn't afford all their top players for more than a few years.

When you land a talent like Davis, you immediately build around him so by time he hits his prime, you have enough to make a run.
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 2:37 pm
Posted by danman6336
Member since Jan 2005
19439 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

Name 5 key contributors from the 2013 draft class
Oladipo
MCW
Steven Adams
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Gorgui Dieng

what do I win?
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 2:39 pm
Posted by Aced
Member since Jul 2013
1653 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:39 pm to
The Spurs had one player on a first round contract this past season. Dell has proven he can find these cheap players that hep control costs without first round picks. Brian Roberts, Morrow, Ayon, Ajinca.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115394 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

But you just told me we needed to wait and see how they play together?

Wouldn't that apply to the Sixers too?

So we have to wait and see if our team is good because they haven't played together, but the Sixers is shite, even though you haven't seem them play together.

huh...


Our team has legit pieces that haven't played together.

Philly is openly tanking. There is a difference.

But let's wait and see how they do as well. I'll bet I can accurately predict them: they will suck.
Posted by danman6336
Member since Jan 2005
19439 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

But let's wait and see how they do as well. I'll bet I can accurately predict them: they will suck.
We shall see

There are probably people out there thinking a team with Noel, MCW, Embiid, Saric, Wroten, Thad Young, a shitload of cap room and about 15 other draft picks is a pretty desirable set up for the future

Compared to a team with one proven star, a couple of solid but sub-all star caliber players, and zero cap room and zero draft picks
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 2:44 pm
Posted by Aced
Member since Jul 2013
1653 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Gorgui Dieng


That's a reach. Averaged 4.8 Pts and 5 rebounds.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
38636 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:43 pm to
last years contributors would have been

vasquez
gordon
lopez
davis
aminu
anderson
smith
rivers
roberts

that team easily would have been in the lottery

coming back this year, everyone above plus noel and a lottery pick. assuming they drafted a point guard and cashed assets for a SF, i agree with you thatthe team would be in a better place. evans was an unnecessary signing, and holiday was not worth 2 lottery picks

water under the bridge now...
Posted by Rico Tubbs
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
465 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:43 pm to
7pts and 4 rebounds (Giannis Antetokounmpo)
5pts and 5 rebounds(Gorgui Dieng)
3pts 4 reounds (Steven Adams)

Try again...Jrue avg. more points than all of those players combined.

Posted by danman6336
Member since Jan 2005
19439 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:46 pm to
quote:

That's a reach. Averaged 4.8 Pts and 5 rebounds.
Which is like 13/13 per 36

Check out his numbers when he hit the starting lineup. He was cranking out double doubles like it was going out of style.
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15169 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

holiday was not worth 2 lottery picks


Posted by danman6336
Member since Jan 2005
19439 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Try again...Jrue avg. more points than all of those players combined.
How do you define "contributor"? You asked for players that contributed. I gave them to you. Do they have to put up 15/5 to contribute?
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61435 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:54 pm to
This debate is pointless right now. The people who think "Top 3 pick" and "15% chance at a Top 3 pick" are synonymous will never agree with the current build philosophy because they are living in a dreamland where 15% = 100%. For those who disagree with the current direction but are capable of discussing this reasonably, you have to at least wait and see the rest of the moves that get made in the next 2 weeks. Trading for Asik changes the equation dramatically, and if they fill the SF hole with a competent role player, then the biggest complaints about the current build philosophy, that it created an imbalanced roster, will have been addressed.
Posted by Rico Tubbs
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
465 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:55 pm to
RE: How do you define "contributor"? You asked for players that contributed. I gave them to you. Do they have to put up 15/5 to contribute?


Key contributor being someone that you can rely on to get you a win in a meaningful game. The first two you mentioned are the only ones that you can label "key", they have the potential to be all-stars in the immediate future. I wish we would have drafted MCW, that is the only player from last years draft that I would take over Jrue. Noel has ZERO game on offense and has a slight frame that I really don't think will last. Next years draft is nothing special, especially if we are drafting in the teens (pick has protection) so getting a guy like Asik huge in replace of a backup rookie at best.
This post was edited on 6/30/14 at 2:57 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32368 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

because hes a change of pace guard who can play multiple positions, can run the 2nd unit behind Jrue


Call me crazy but I'd rather the Tyreke that averaged 20-5-5 while shooting 50 percent from the field over the Tyreke that averaged 13-3-3 while shooting 40 percent off of the bench.
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
22776 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 3:27 pm to
I would not consider a team without Holiday and Evans a better situation. The Pelicans are not a small market team so try will not just easily attract big time FAs to a bare team (AD isn't enough to just attract other players).

Unless the Pelicans make a big move with Anderson I think the team will most likely move Rivers to accommodate the Asik trade and give us the MLE.

IMO the Pelicans with Davis, Holiday, Evans, Gordon, Anderson, and Asik have one of the more talented rosters in the league.

Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17713 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 3:42 pm to
If Tyreke comes off the bench again this year, the coach needs to be fired. And we know that ain't happening.

To answer the OP. We chose the "win now" approach bc the excuse was we never had talent (which was actually true the 2nd year of Monty). So we traded our 1st rounder (unknown talent) for an all star PG. We also landed a former rookie of the year in Tyreke. The problem is/was injuries and the ineptness of our head coach. So we go with the "acquire talent now" than try to rebuild thru the draft.

The one common denominator of losing is Monty Williams. I know y'all are tired of me saying it, but our coach is a joke. We have the talent this year to make a it to at least the 2nd round of the playoffs. The thing is, IMO, that there's no way we will make it to the 2nd round. Monty's shortcomings as a coach (adjustments) will be glaring come playoffs. He will be out coached in a 7 games series so bad, it'll be a joke.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63431 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

This debate is pointless right now. The people who think "Top 3 pick" and "15% chance at a Top 3 pick" are synonymous will never agree with the current build philosophy because they are living in a dreamland where 15% = 100%.


fricking A.

quote:

For those who disagree with the current direction but are capable of discussing this reasonably, you have to at least wait and see the rest of the moves that get made in the next 2 weeks. Trading for Asik changes the equation dramatically, and if they fill the SF hole with a competent role player, then the biggest complaints about the current build philosophy, that it created an imbalanced roster, will have been addressed.



Pretty much.
Posted by jgman
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
17 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 5:27 pm to
LINK

not strapped
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30080 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 5:37 pm to
Vasquez was traded twice last year (first to sac-town and then to toronto). And Sacramento needs a 'good pg' pretty badly as well.

Noel has not even touched a court yet, so we'll never know. Even still, now you have Embiid possibly starting over him. Noel could become the next Thabeet for all we know.

What SF could we have gotten in this draft or last? Lets see:

Shabazz? Couldn't even get many minutes
Giannis? 24 minutes; 7/4/2; 41/35/68
McDermott? Sure, I'd go with this one
Saric? Won't play for another 2 years
Warren? Bench player imo
Young? Ditto
Hood? Ditto

Without those trades, we'd be putting on the court the 2012 team. Robin Lopez would still be shitting the bed, and we'd have more holes than we do now. But we would SURELY have a bit of cash to land...no one or overpay for a mediocre player.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 6/30/14 at 5:59 pm to
A few thoughts:

Any time you are echoing what the Knicks and Nets are doing with regards to moving draft picks, it's not a bad idea to at least step back and reevaluate. That said, the players they are getting are better than the guys those teams were adding.

It's not about keeping picks, drafting, and then developing star players. That doesn't happen all too often- Indiana and Chicago are as much of an outlier as OKC is. But that doesn't mean you eschew the draft because the odds are low. The odds are low for every method of team building.

The talent is here. They should be pretty good (natch). Is it enough to make the playoffs? Who knows. Do I think they overpaid to get Holiday and Evans? Yes. Do I hate those moves? No. I think Demps probably overpaid a little to get Asik, but that was his best move since dealing for Anderson.

Like ATL said, we need to see who goes to make sure Asik fits. And we need to see what happens with a healthy roster to really say whether they blew it or not. So far, it's been a bit of a bust due to injury.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram